Pac 8 division champion is impossible to achieve.
Collapse
-
-
He's like his idol FloIV who became a racist cuz he can't accept that pac got the FIGHTER OF THE DECADE award and now bumbum12 became a racist becasue he also couldnt accept that pac is a 8 division champion.
Comment
-
I've made the comparison before and I think it is really accurate-Manny's FOTD is like Karl Malone's MVP's-the media voted for them over Floyd/Jordan for reasons only they know. In the end they better man proved he was better beyond any reasonable doubt.
It really is sad that media members that vote on these awards use their votes in this way. Frankly, anyone that voted Karl MVP or Manny FOTD should probably have their voting rights taken away for such an egregious vote.
As to this thread-in the era of promoter gifted titles that Manny has flourished in, I think it may be possible for a guy to get enough title fights to get belts in 8 divisions, especially if that fighter can avoid PED testing as he goes up in weight.
Look at Broner-he is halfway there already.Comment
-
I kind of have heard Hatton insinuate it but his reasoning isn't satisfactory really. Along lines of he had more time assess floyd and that he wasn't at his best against pac and he was koed too fast to assess pac? That's not pacs fault. Floyd cheating sc sales v jmm was Floyd's fault.
Not sure of this again as pac stopped cotto. And cotton picked Pac to beat floyd and that floyd ducked Pac as he knew Pac would ko him. They're cotton words.
So really seems like cotto thinks Pac was the man. If cotto thinks floyd was the best that is rather odd to say the least, but not entirely unlikely, as floyd has some of best skills boxing seen but not necessarily took biggest risks or has best resume. So anyways doesn't mean he is saying floyd is best of era. He thinks Pac resume is more in depth and best of era.Last edited by hugh grant; 06-01-2018, 10:54 AM.Comment
-
You can't say that we should get these guys' opinions, and then give excuses for why they didn't pick who you wanted them to pic! That's not fair.I kind of have heard Hatton insinuate it but his reasoning isn't satisfactory really. Along lines of he had more time assess floyd and that he wasn't at his best against pac and he was koed too fast to assess pac? That's not pacs fault. Floyd cheating sc sales v jmm was Floyd's fault.
Not sure of this again as pac stopped cotto. And cotton picked Pac to beat floyd and that floyd ducked Pac as he knew Pac would ko him. They're cotton words.
So really seems like cotto thinks Pac was the man. If cotto thinks floyd was the best that is rather odd to say the least, but not entirely unlikely, as floyd has some of best skills boxing seen but not necessarily took biggest risks or has best resume. So anyways doesn't mean he is saying floyd is best of era. He thinks Pac resume is more in depth and best of era.
Comment
-
Comment
-
Comment
-
If he says that Mayweather is the best that he fought, wouldn't that mean that he is better than Pacquiao?
I sent the article with Hatton saying that Floyd is the best of the generation. It was the link.
Hatton Reacts To Kellerman: Mayweather on Top, Not Pacquiao
Comment
Comment