Comments Thread For: Whyte Will Fight WBC's Call That Breazeale is Wilder's Mandatory

[Laligalaliga]

Being the WBC silver champion means absolutely nothing😭😭
By that logic Kudratillo Abdukakhorov should be fighting for the W5BC 147 belt instead of DSG and Porter😂😂
Absolutely pathetic.

Whyte hasn’t earned ****, he beat an inactive, out of shape Lucas Browne, and is now crying cause he hasn’t been gifted the mandatory position, it’s pathetic.

And who did breazeale beat to earn it?

[Laligalaliga]

A fan boy of who exactly??😂
Sounds like you’re a Whyte fan boy with an extremely limited understanding of this sport...

If you could actually read coherently, you’d understand that I completely disagree with Brezeale being mandatory but as I said “two wrongs don’t make a right”, just because Brezeale was gifted the mandatory via beating C level guys and good management, doesn’t mean every other fighter in the division should just be gifted title shots without beating any top level contenders.

Now whyte has options after wbc shenanigans.... Either continue with the wbc route or take them to court for false information or take the ibf route. If he beats pulev, it's a win win for him. Title shot and a massive pay day.
I believe he has brains to make the right decisions.

[joseph5620]

Sorry, can’t support the WBC on this...and I can’t support Whyte either. The former’s rules make no sense and the latter needs to sit down after fighting that slob in his last fight.

That fight was awful. Both of those fighters looked terrible.

[N/A]

That's bull****, after Suleiman has assured him that breazeale/molina was not a final eliminator

What evidence is there that Sulaiman assured Hearn Breazeale wasn't fighting a final eliminator?

[Deus]

they want to see whyte fight breazealle and not Ortiz and they are posting everything against AJ wilder happening, I thought boxing fans wanted to see the best fight the best, who the hell wants to see whyte fight breazealle??? He called Ortiz an old bum and so did the UK and HEARN fans but now they are doing everything to support him not getting the Whyte fight? im confused bro

The entire article talks about Whyte being willing to face Ortiz for the mandatory position and that his issue isn't fighting Ortiz but that he'd be fighting Ortiz for the second mandatory slot and not to be Wilder's current mandatory?

Whyte v Ortiz would be a fun fight (which Ortiz would no doubt win). Anything with Breazeale in is just trash... but then maybe my perception of Breazeale is tarnished from watching him being a literal punching bag for 7 rounds against Joshua.

What evidence is there that Sulaiman assured Hearn Breazeale wasn't fighting a final eliminator?

Don't know how to embed tweets but:

https://twitter.com/MichaelBensonn/status/988871777974661123

The guy there appears to have screens hotted official correspondence with the WBC.

That's all I can find anyway.

[N/A]

Don't know how to embed tweets but:

https://twitter.com/MichaelBensonn/status/988871777974661123

The guy there appears to have screens hotted official correspondence with the WBC.

That's all I can find anyway.

Since when is an email between Michael Benson and Tito González proof of something said between Eddie Hearn and Sulaiman?

[Deus]

Since when is an email between Michael Benson and Tito González proof of something said between Eddie Hearn and Sulaiman?

Are you incapable of having a conversation without coming across totally confrontational?

It isn't. I don't have that and haven't seen it, hence why I said right at the end "that's all I can find anyway". Was merely pointing out that apparently there is correspondence online where the WBC have said that that fight wasn't a final eliminator. I don't know if it's valid and truthfully I don't even care... I wasn't even arguing a point and just recalled seeing that in a topic here so figured i'd post it for you in case you hadn't seen it.

[N/A]

Are you incapable of having a conversation without coming across totally confrontational?

Not confronting you. You did me a favor. You and I both know there is nothing from Hearn and Sulaiman. It's more effective coming from you than coming from me. Just using your post to show others that even a third party such as yourself agrees there is nothing to be found between Hearn and Sulaiman.

It isn't. I don't have that and haven't seen it, hence why I said right at the end "that's all I can find anyway". Was merely pointing out that apparently there is correspondence online where the WBC have said that that fight wasn't a final eliminator. I don't know if it's valid and truthfully I don't even care... I wasn't even arguing a point and just recalled seeing that in a topic here so figured i'd post it for you in case you hadn't seen it.

I've seen it. There's no time stamp so we don't know what part of the process it's from. Tito may have had out date info, or may not have been privy to Sulaiman's final decision.

You did a good job finding all their is and your findings back up my position. Apologies if it came across as me attacking you.

[Oshio]

Sulaiman would be thinking, no, cooking the lie to tell boxing fans now. It is a good course to contest WBC's position

[Oshio]

Breazeale has not fought anyone apart from Joshua