Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

There is clear reason to believe Golovkin MW career is better than Hopkins

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #31
    Originally posted by Rip Chudd View Post
    Yep, stopped at the same spot
    This is just because you dislike the truth, you know both situations are similar, 3-2 MW resume... with some of the weakest wins possible on that resume, ffs Brook could easily have KOed the C level guys like Mayorga and Sloppy.
    Fact is Hopkins best win is a guy who should have been at SWW, but instead he fought a bloated up SWW who was far too small for MW.

    Haters want to hate, but you know If GGG fought the same guy you'd all be saying the exact same thing.

    Comment


    • #32
      Originally posted by BoxingIsGreat View Post
      That single win over Tito is better than anything GGG has done so far, or will ever do. I'm far from a Hopkins fan.
      ... not a B-Hop fan either, but he's a true legend and deserves the utmost respect...

      Comment


      • #33
        Originally posted by BombSquad View Post
        Hopkins beating a welterweight is his marquee win, let that sink in... Racism is very real.
        Tito moved the weights progressively. Didn't he campaign at JMW for a couple of years and beat top guys like Fernando Vargas before moving up to middleweight?

        Yes, racism is real, otherwise people like GGG wouldn't be anywhere near a top 10 P4P list.

        Comment


        • #34
          can you imagine if golovkin dragged spence/thurman up from 147 for a fight? Id bet my life that people wouldnt be saying 'oh but they good at 147 doe'. by all accounts it looks as if brook is a natural 154'er too so it wasnt some huge hike up in weight either. but cause hopkins does it its fine, good old bhop, legend.

          Comment


          • #35
            FACT

            Glen Johnson has better wins on his resume than Bumlovkin and anyone Bumlovkin has ever beaten...

            Comment


            • #36
              Originally posted by HeadShots View Post
              whack joke.

              Trinidad is 3-2 at MW. fact.
              Trinidad is a first ballot HOF'er. His win over Joppy is unquestionably better than Bumlovkin's win over Jacobs. Why? Joppy had never been KO'ed. He came into the Trinidad fight with one loss - BUT - that loss was AVENGED. Jacobs, OTOH, got KO'ed by Pirog.

              Trinidad put a beating on Joppy while Bumlovkin only managed to get a gift decision against Jacobs..

              Comment


              • #37
                Why these threads? Neither Golovkin nor BHOP defeated any opponents who ever distinguished themselves in the MW division.

                Comment


                • #38
                  Originally posted by BombSquad View Post
                  Tito fought the weakest 160 title holder, fact!
                  Bernard Hopkins?

                  Comment


                  • #39
                    Originally posted by BombSquad View Post
                    Hopkins beating a welterweight is his marquee win, let that sink in... Racism is very real.
                    Exactly WHO has Bumlovkin beaten?

                    Last I checked, Bumlovkin also fought a welterweight in his last fight and could only manage a draw...

                    Comment


                    • #40
                      GGG's best win is Jacobs ffs. Jacobs couldn't hold Joppy's jockstrap.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X
                      TOP