I am a fan of GGG, and I'm not going to comment on who's reign was more impressive. Honestly both resumes aren't stellar. I will say that GGG would have had a long night fighting Hopkins in his prime. A truly great fighter who could adapt to his opponent. He could fight inside, outside, box or slug. Not to mention he was tricky and knew every trick in the book.
Comments Thread For: GGG: Look at Hopkins; My Record's Much Bigger, Stronger at 160!
Collapse
-
-
I’m talking about defenses at mw.
Jacobs is vastly better than any of Hopkins defenses, except Tito.Comment
-
Comment
-
William Joppy was an *undefeated* beltholder @ 160 when Trinidad train-wrecked him.Joppy, r u f.....serious?, Joppy? The HOF for boxing is a more of joke than any other sport. Joppy shouldn’t even sniff any HOF. Joppy??? That’s your argument. Jacobs, Alvarez, and Lemieux would mop the floor with his a... Get the hell out this blog! It’s for real boxing fans!!!!
How many *undefeated* beltholders @ 160 has the Triple Duck beaten?Comment
-
Baldomir was a p4p! That's all that matters, it doesn't matter when they fought, just as long as the person was p4p at some time.Comment
-
-
Tarver was the #1 LHW in the world when GJ beat him. Stop smoking the Crack.
LMAO
Baldomir is a career WELTERWEIGHT and anyone who thinks he should have been on a P4P list DKSAB...
LMAO
Put down the Crack pipe, Pookie...Comment
Comment