Comments Thread For: GGG: Look at Hopkins; My Record's Much Bigger, Stronger at 160!

[Chuckguy]

All 3 judges (even guy who gave GGG the win) gave Canelo 1, 2, 10, 11, and 12.



I guess you know more about boxing than those 3 and myself?

**** out your mouth boy :/

Yes I do now open your mouth baby so I can put it in just like u want

[aboutfkntime]

Seems to be a lot of confusion on this thread.

1. If you are strictly talking about 160, ggg has fought more quanity of quality opponents.

2.hopkins is the better fighter, but if just going by 160, ggg has defended better.

3. Hopkins lost to a top mw in Roy Jones, then beat up a bunch of cringe contenders for the rest of the 90s

4.glen johnson wasn’t the fighter you all think of when he fought Hopkins. Young glen johnson was a counterpuncher that tried to be slick. It was until Hopkins carved him up and glen started fighting the euro champs that he changed his style into the rugged road warrior everyone knows. Good win by Hopkins, but glen was not good as a counterpuncher, and it wasn’t until a complete change of style when glen achieved any real success.

5.hopkins best win was Tito, golovkin’s is Jacobs or draw with canelo. Tito >>> Jacobs or canelo

6. Allen, Echols, Eastman, Holmes, old joppy, Carl Daniels, aren’t as good as geale, Murray, macklin, kell, lemuix overall, especially considering when in their careers they fought

7. Most of hopkins best moments came above 160


8. 160- Canelo, Jacobs, Murray, geale, lemuiex, macklin > Tito, Holmes, Echols, joppy, Allen, johnson

GREAT post..... but I completely disagree bro

your #5 point..... /thread

Hopkins has a better win than Golovkin at 160

it only takes one

multiple (even numerous) lesser "good" wins, do not eclipse that one "very good" win..... quality > quantity when it comes to resume comparisons

Hopkins showed a higher ceiling..... as-in..... he " proved " that he had a higher ceiling

[aboutfkntime]

Difference is that Brook jumped from 147 to 160 with no fights. Tito proved himself to be a HOF at 147 and 154. Most folks are factoring in that Hopkins fought Tito and DLH at 157 and 156 respectively as well as the fact that both were known as skilled technicians.

Tito was a huge favorite, and proven at 160

Brook..... was not, nobody gave him a chance

Tito = great..... Brook = not so much

typical ridiculous statement/comparison, from the golov-fans lol

[aboutfkntime]

Resume isn’t about winning it’s about names

[aboutfkntime]

Ok, if it’s just names then yeah hopkins is better, but if you take into account successful defenses, I lean towards ggg

nope

chuck is right on the money

just names

[aboutfkntime]

Yes I do now open your mouth baby so I can put it in just like u want

but wow, that is interesting

so..... Canelo won 5 rounds on EVERY single card ???

out of 15 possible scores for those 5 rounds, all 15 went to Canelo

it changes nothing of course, because I watched that fight..... but, interesting

a draw, was not out of the question at all

[Chuckguy]

but wow, that is interesting

so..... Canelo won 5 rounds on EVERY single card ???

out of 15 possible scores for those 5 rounds, all 15 went to Canelo

it changes nothing of course, because I watched that fight..... but, interesting

a draw, was not out of the question at all

It could have gone either way time but I’m not into a rematch there are better fights out there right now and ggg needs to take action now we’ll after his bs fight on Saturday

[aboutfkntime]

like I said yesterday, when this thread (and the poll) first started...

Hopkins best win is Trinidad..... Golovkin's best win is Jacobs

/thread

silly discussion..... that was a real dumb thing to say Gennady lol

[Sugar Adam Ali]

GREAT post..... but I completely disagree bro

your #5 point..... /thread

Hopkins has a better win than Golovkin at 160

it only takes one

multiple (even numerous) lesser "good" wins, do not eclipse that one "very good" win..... quality > quantity when it comes to resume comparisons

Hopkins showed a higher ceiling..... as-in..... he " proved " that he had a higher ceiling

Are you going by biggest win or body of work.

Biggest win and buster Douglas and rid**** bowe are greater than Holyfield
Body of work and it’s all Holyfield.


Hopkins has maybe the single biggest win, but ggg has more depth of opponents and especially in terms of wins.

The 2 best middleweights hopkins fought, he lost to, everyone else wasn’t no very good besides Tito.

[Bronx2245]

Have you seen some of the names GGG has fought??? Sounds more like fkn P orn Star Names!

I am a Gardner
Malik Diarrea
Milton Numnutz
Kissim Abuma
Lajuan Simon Says
Makoto ***imi
Grzego Prosak
Nobuhiro Ishtalota
Osumanu Adumy

Man I can go on and on!

Gonna be my new P orn names I check into hotels as....

I can't even imagine living in the 702! Boxing, Adult Entertainment, and Hotels, on the daily? I'm sure I would've been dead 10 years ago! Or else, I would be smoked out, ********, sitting next to GGG's former opponents at the slot machines!