Comments Thread For: GGG: Look at Hopkins; My Record's Much Bigger, Stronger at 160!

[Shadoww702]

pretty sure that a draw counts as a successful defence

it should do, because the champion kept his titles

and that is one fight I don't mind on Golovkin's resume'

But like these Kunts are saying it does NOT count because he's not a true MW.

I mean if Hopkins good wins don't count why should GGG's???

So the only good MW o his resume is Jacob's who got dropped by Pillow fists!

[aboutfkntime]

It's not relevant. Because the upper limit for MW title fights is always 160 lbs.

BHop chosing to weigh in below the sanctioned limit to fight WW's doesn't give him a better MW record than GGG.

they way I see it, you are technically correct

the problem is, boxing is not about technicalities

Hopkins did not technically " may have beaten Trinidad "..... he actually did beat Trinidad

and Golovkin talked about 154 both before and after refusing to negotiate on weight with Cotto/Canelo

you guys called Canelo a middleweight, because he won the WBC belt by beating a faded JMW who weighed 153, at 155..... but Trinidad beat Joppy

sounds like everyone (not just you) is picking and choosing when to apply technicalities, and when to apply common-sense

fair call about 155

[Shadoww702]

Bumlovkin's opponents have done next to *nothing*. Please name ONE of Bumlovkin's opponents who have done 1/2 of what Glen Johnson has accomplished...

One of GGG's best wins Lemuix was KTFO by Rubio. And career 154 lb Alcine beat him.

And Geale tiny Cotto smashed him 1 round later then GGG did.

[Curt Henning]

But like these Kunts are saying it does NOT count because he's not a true MW.

I mean if Hopkins good wins don't count why should GGG's???

So the only good MW o his resume is Jacob's who got dropped by Pillow fists!

remember when they thought jacobs was ducking over money and wasnt gonna fight lil g?

"omg who does this guy think he is....pirog murdered him and featherfisted mora dropped him omg"

now they wanna talk like he top 20 p4p or something

[Nay_Sayer]

Rubio.
That was easy.
Murray.
Geale.
Gardner did as well against Dawson as Glen did.

LMAO.

Leave the Crack alone. GJ holds a W over the #1 guy @ 175lbs. What has Rubio, Murray, Geale, and Gardner ever done?

[Shadoww702]

they way I see it, you are technically correct

the problem is, boxing is not about technicalities

Hopkins did not technically " may have beaten Trinidad "..... he actually did beat Trinidad

and Golovkin talked about 154 both before and after refusing to negotiate on weight with Cotto/Canelo

you guys called Canelo a middleweight, because he won the WBC belt by beating a faded JMW who weighed 153, at 155..... but Trinidad beat Joppy

sounds like everyone (not just you) is picking and choosing when to apply technicalities, and when to apply common-sense

fair call about 155

Sounds more like a bunch of POS hypocrites to me... GGG fans are officially WORSE than P acTARDS x1000

[Shadoww702]

remember when they thought jacobs was ducking over money and wasnt gonna fight lil g?

"omg who does this guy think he is....pirog murdered him and featherfisted mora dropped him omg"

now they wanna talk like he top 20 p4p or something

That's how they roll. Fighter is DOG sht before then is a future, HoFamer, BADDEST dude on the planet. Top 5 P4Per when fights GGG.


I remember these jack asses trying to convince me how GREAT House Arrest Wade was. And I felt he LOST to 100 year old Salimon!

[aboutfkntime]

But like these Kunts are saying it does NOT count because he's not a true MW.

I mean if Hopkins good wins don't count why should GGG's???

So the only good MW o his resume is Jacob's who got dropped by Pillow fists!

they do count

referring to Trinidad as a welter is ridiculous nonsense

really ridiculous

whilst it may be possible to belittle some of Hopkins/Golovkin's opponents..... Trinidad is not one of them..... he was a 3/1 favorite in that fight

after Tito knocked out Joppy, nobody gave Hopkins a chance

Canelo and Jacobs do count (even if you think Jacobs beat Golovkin, because it is in the book..... you have to assume Hopkins got similarly favorable decisions, and he did)..... but the first 11 defences of the regular title is the problem imho

[Curt Henning]

That's how they roll. Fighter is DOG sht before then is a future, HoFamer, BADDEST dude on the planet. Top 5 P4Per when fights GGG.


I remember these jack asses trying to convince me how GREAT House Arrest Wade was. And I felt he LOST to 100 year old Salimon!

good ole ankle bracelet wade!!! boy is a beast! ibf mando injury replacement!!! they dont make em like that anymore!!!

[Sugar Adam Ali]

Seems to be a lot of confusion on this thread.

1. If you are strictly talking about 160, ggg has fought more quanity of quality opponents.

2.hopkins is the better fighter, but if just going by 160, ggg has defended better.

3. Hopkins lost to a top mw in Roy Jones, then beat up a bunch of cringe contenders for the rest of the 90s

4.glen johnson wasn’t the fighter you all think of when he fought Hopkins. Young glen johnson was a counterpuncher that tried to be slick. It was until Hopkins carved him up and glen started fighting the euro champs that he changed his style into the rugged road warrior everyone knows. Good win by Hopkins, but glen was not good as a counterpuncher, and it wasn’t until a complete change of style when glen achieved any real success.

5.hopkins best win was Tito, golovkin’s is Jacobs or draw with canelo. Tito >>> Jacobs or canelo

6. Allen, Echols, Eastman, Holmes, old joppy, Carl Daniels, aren’t as good as geale, Murray, macklin, kell, lemuix overall, especially considering when in their careers they fought

7. Most of hopkins best moments came above 160


8. 160- Canelo, Jacobs, Murray, geale, lemuiex, macklin > Tito, Holmes, Echols, joppy, Allen, johnson