-
-
If he was using it to cheat then why would he submit to this sort of thing knowing that it could further incriminate him? I don't think that he would unless you want to believe that he had some influence over the testers which is unlikely imo.Comment
-
Because it was meat contamination. This is kind of the entire point of the test. You’re actuallly arguing in favor of Canelo at times and you don’t even realize it. “If his levels were already low”, as you say. It’s beyond obvious that you just don’t want to believe it could be contaminated meat. You are using the fact that he has low levels consistent with meat contamination as an excuse as to why his lack of a positive test this time came back negative which would further the argument that it WAS meat contamination.
“Why?” You ask... maybe the entire reasoning behind it all is why.
“Take tests to prove its meat contamination.”
“Sure. -passes test-.”
“I don’t believe it. Why would you pass? There were other people who used it for real and they all popped at such random levels that *I BELIVE* it’s possible for someone who tested to test clean, because..well..I refuse to believe it. I don’t care if the users all popped as users with the test. Because they get random numbers coming back, I, despite my evidence showing the contrary, have come to the conclusion that he is guilty because *I* believe he is. Who cares if my evidence is actually helping to prove he seems to not be guilty? ”
That’s how everyone sees that post.
If everyone is supposedly testing for even the most miniscule amount, to figures 100x higher, then no matter how varying, you can’t just SPECULATE an imaginative result of zero also being possible because that hasn’t been the case.
Now, I’m no expert on hair tests but it seems you’re not either. Canelo has long enough hair to provide a good test and going by his social mexia, he hasnt gotten rid of it this entire time.
And to answer the question people keep saying “but if he popped for such low levels before, how come it didn’t show?”
To answer that (again, my understanding) it’s because small, trace amounts (meat contamination for example) does not provide the hair with levels that can be tested for. It’s actually the entire reasoning behind this test. If he were using clen, the hair test would show (with varying, inaccurate NUMBERS, but numbers nonetheless) that he was using.
What cheeks isnt realizing is that if Canelo had tested even for a miniscule amount, that’s where his study would come into effect. Any small amount, no matter how small in the hair, indicates it was used. A small amount doesn’t indicate a small cycle for example. It can be a heavy cycle that only shows as small. We get that. What the test proves though is that you DID use. Like a pregnancy test. As long as the image shows, no matter how faint or dark, you’re pregnant. It doesn’t mean you’re 1 day pregnant, 7 months, etc. The important and noteworthy thing is that yoh are indeed pregnant and in this case, that you did indeed use clen.
Again, the levels ARE showing, just not at accurate levels. The test isnt there to find out how much you used, it’s to show you *did* and that’s the point here. Meat contamination wouldn’t show on hair BECAUSE it’s meat contamination.
You wouldn’t go out and eat a taco every night and expect to have clen benefits, right? Unless...you actually believe that’s also how that works. If that’s the case, bless your heart.
Not a scientist here or anything, but it’s kind of a no brainer. Common sense.
He, along with the rest of the sport, if they’re using, they’re probably using something better or different. Especially at that level...Comment
Tweet
Comment