Canelo Hair follicle result

[-Kev-]

He innocent

[TonyGe]

He took the hair test and apparently is going to be tested on a regular basis. It's time to put this issue to bed. I don't like Canelo but let's just concentrate on the fight itself and not the circus..

[kidbazooka]

Why are people acting so ignorant in the face of evidence? If he's proven to have not been taking it regularly, are you really so afraid of the truth that you need to try to laugh it away?

Canelo haters are blinded by there hate

[jaded]

Here's a little info I found about the reliability of the hair test for clen and hair colour...

https://www.bloodyelbow.com/2018/3/3...ed-failed-test

The hair test

There has been a push in some quarters to use the “hair test” in order to convict or clear Canelo. To hear it told, this hair test is the answer to every question. In reality, hair testing for clenbuterol isn’t used for a reason; it’s incredibly unreliable.

The amount of clenbuterol that shows up in hair varies massively depending on factors like hair color. One study gave a group of people the same amount of clenbuterol. One participant, a 27-year-old female, showed 23 ng/g of clenbuterol in her hair afterwards. Another participant, also a 27-year-old female, showed 161 ng/g of clenbuterol in her hair. They both took the exact same amount, but one had seven times as much in her sample. The suggested reason for this discrepancy? The women had different hair color. This hair color discrepancy was supported by the other data in the study.

That might sound ridiculous, but other studies have found the same thing.

Another study, with more participants, found that even among subjects with similar hair color, the variation is still large. Despite every subject having hair listed as “brown” or “dark brown”, this study also found significant variation:

The lowest detected amount of clenbuterol in the first segment of hair was 0.43 pg/ng, the largest amount was 4.76 pg/ng. Both of these subjects had hair classed as “brown,” and both took the same amount of clenbuterol in the same way. That’s a difference of an entire order of magnitude. A similar issue was found in the second segments, which ranged from a detected amount of 0.00 pg/ng to 0.86 pg/ng.

Tests that have results varying by so much even under a controlled conditions are not reliable tests. The idea that they would somehow give us the information we need to determine if Canelo accidentally or deliberately ingested clenbuterol is ridiculous.

[bigdunny1]

Canelo haters are blinded by there hate

a lot of flip flopping motherphukers up in here. Same clowns who quoted Victor Conte and stated that Canelo was guilty because he wouldn't volunteer to a hair test which would convict or clear his name. he does just that and it comes back negative and now same folks saying I refuse to acknowledge the test. Now hair tests don't prove shyt and are inaccurate. LMAO at these clowns and their witch hunt. Fools made up their mind out of hatred nothing more. Canelo gave Nevada receipts to where he bought the meat, he had small trace amounts consistent with meat NOT PED use. Mexico has huge meat problem. Hair test shows PED use and stays for up to 6 months because those dosages are much higher then the small trace amounts you get from meat.

[Street15]

But he hasn't been cleared. They didnt suspend because they thought he was purposely doping. They suspended him because Clenbuterol was in his system in the 1st place. Why are people failing to realize that?

(They are so caught up in the "but you said he was doping on purpose and cheating for years" narrative. It doesn't matter what boxing fans say. It's not the fans that create these NSAC bylaws. Fans can say anything. The onus is on Canelo to make sure that Clen doesn't end up in his system in the first place. His team and his lawyers knew that before even signing the fight)

It looks like an act of negligence, which is pretty embarrassing that all of this came down to simply negligence. I can't believe Eric Gomez who went on record might I add, saying that he didn't advise Canelo against eating certain beef. He's been in the game faaar too long. He knows better than that. Canelo as well. This aint the first time he heard of Clen. He too knows better than that.

[Mexican_Puppet]

Why are people acting so ignorant in the face of evidence? If he's proven to have not been taking it regularly, are you really so afraid of the truth that you need to try to laugh it away?

They are haters.

Simply thats the answer.

They are haters

[Mexican_Puppet]

Here's a little info I found about the reliability of the hair test for clen and hair colour...

https://www.bloodyelbow.com/2018/3/3...ed-failed-test

The hair test

There has been a push in some quarters to use the “hair test” in order to convict or clear Canelo. To hear it told, this hair test is the answer to every question. In reality, hair testing for clenbuterol isn’t used for a reason; it’s incredibly unreliable.

The amount of clenbuterol that shows up in hair varies massively depending on factors like hair color. One study gave a group of people the same amount of clenbuterol. One participant, a 27-year-old female, showed 23 ng/g of clenbuterol in her hair afterwards. Another participant, also a 27-year-old female, showed 161 ng/g of clenbuterol in her hair. They both took the exact same amount, but one had seven times as much in her sample. The suggested reason for this discrepancy? The women had different hair color. This hair color discrepancy was supported by the other data in the study.

That might sound ridiculous, but other studies have found the same thing.

Another study, with more participants, found that even among subjects with similar hair color, the variation is still large. Despite every subject having hair listed as “brown” or “dark brown”, this study also found significant variation:

The lowest detected amount of clenbuterol in the first segment of hair was 0.43 pg/ng, the largest amount was 4.76 pg/ng. Both of these subjects had hair classed as “brown,” and both took the same amount of clenbuterol in the same way. That’s a difference of an entire order of magnitude. A similar issue was found in the second segments, which ranged from a detected amount of 0.00 pg/ng to 0.86 pg/ng.

Tests that have results varying by so much even under a controlled conditions are not reliable tests. The idea that they would somehow give us the information we need to determine if Canelo accidentally or deliberately ingested clenbuterol is ridiculous.

Hahahahahahaha.

Ian Kidd? Who the **** is that shi.t?

[Death_Adder]

Yeah dumb inbred motherfuckers.

Hair follicle, negative. N E G A T I V E

Inbred whiteboys now want to make excuses or dumb jokes. Fuck outta here wth that.

Go plan your next mass shooting Gomer.

[Mexican_Puppet]

should we believe dunny who says the test proves he didnt cheat or the people who carried out the test and who said its extremely difficult to detect clen? hmmm i wonder. i'm riding with dunny he's the least biased person on here. those scientists are pac fans. some people wanted an inaccurate hair test so they got it and that proves canelo is innocent somehow ok leap in logic sure but innocent!

Clembuterol lasts 6 months in the hair, ignorant