Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Canelo Hair follicle result

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #61
    Just let Golovkin eat some Mexican meat and get on with the fight

    Comment


    • #62
      Originally posted by Redd Foxx View Post
      Incorrect. Trace samples, such as one would expect from tainted meat, may not show up. But, usage in a PED context will. That is why they have the test.
      1) Canelo's first test was not "trace levels"
      2) "May not"? Please provide backup. Everything I've seen say that if they test specifically for Clenbuterol, which they did, they test down to the minutest levels.
      3) Why would they test SPECIFICALLY for Clenbuterol and put high thresholds on detection?

      This test makes no sense no matter how you look at it. Why did they ONLY test for Clen, only to put high threshold levels? Why did they not test for everything else as is the protocol? Why did they wait until end of March to submit for this test? Why did they wait until end of April to publish said "results"?

      They were laying low while the investigation went on, now all of a sudden Oscar can't shut up about how clean he is.
      Don't buy it. Not a fricking ounce of this.

      Comment


      • #63
        Originally posted by Redd Foxx View Post
        Because hair samples can find the levels used for performance enhancement, but not always trace levels, like you'd find in meat contamination.
        Why do you ignore this?

        It's a difficult process to be able to confirm whether there is clenbuterol in the hair follicles, it is even more difficult to run on light-colored hair.

        Comment


        • #64
          Originally posted by j0zef View Post
          1) Canelo's first test was not "trace levels"
          2) "May not"? Please provide backup. Everything I've seen say that if they test specifically for Clenbuterol, which they did, they test down to the minutest levels.
          3) Why would they test SPECIFICALLY for Clenbuterol and put high thresholds on detection?

          This test makes no sense no matter how you look at it. Why did they ONLY test for Clen, only to put high threshold levels? Why did they not test for everything else as is the protocol? Why did they wait until end of March to submit for this test? Why did they wait until end of April to publish said "results"?

          They were laying low while the investigation went on, now all of a sudden Oscar can't shut up about how clean he is.
          Don't buy it. Not a fricking ounce of this.
          123456798...

          And to that sum that EVERYONE in the boxing comunity (boxers, trainers, promoters) except GBP and some mexicans are claiming Canelo is a cheater.

          Comment


          • #65
            should we believe dunny who says the test proves he didnt cheat or the people who carried out the test and who said its extremely difficult to detect clen? hmmm i wonder. i'm riding with dunny he's the least biased person on here. those scientists are pac fans. some people wanted an inaccurate hair test so they got it and that proves canelo is innocent somehow ok leap in logic sure but innocent!
            Last edited by daggum; 04-26-2018, 09:19 PM.

            Comment


            • #66
              Originally posted by _Maxi View Post
              Why do you ignore this?
              hey you are ignoring the part of the article that says PROMOTER SAYS CANELO IS INNOCENT!

              Comment


              • #67
                Originally posted by daggum View Post
                cept its not true. it says so in the article that its very difficult to detect clen in the hair. this was a fake out to fool people who only read headlines. its like doing a cancer biopsy to find out if you have any std's. hey look i came back clean of stds! but thats not what it tested...this is exactly what canelos slimy promoter is doing. the old fake out. the old slight of hand. the old razzle dazzle
                The ol'razzle dazzle lmfao

                Comment


                • #68
                  http://www.espn.com/boxing/story/_/id/23328867/saul-canelo-alvarez-had-hair-follicle-testing-request-nevada-state-athletic-commission

                  The results document, which was provided to ESPN, was returned on April 20 with a single note in the section reserved for analysis details: "Hair sample tested for clenbuterol. Clenbuterol was not detected."

                  The negative hair follicle test is notable because while clenbuterol is detectable in urine for less than a week after it is ingested, the drug can be detected in hair for several months.

                  Comment


                  • #69
                    So he tested positive in February and 2
                    Months later he provides a hair sample. Why the delay?
                    Either way he tested positive and deserves the suspension hopefully he learned his lesson and won’t eat ****en meat when in Mexico it’s simple

                    Comment


                    • #70
                      Originally posted by Turd Best Ever View Post
                      Just let Golovkin eat some Mexican meat and get on with the fight
                      This is the best resolution haha

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X
                      TOP