Jacobs-Sulecki is a way better fight than GGG-Vanes

[j0zef]

Eh, arguable. Both top 10 fighters in a lower division. Sulecki never fought anyone on a big stage and is undefeated, while vanes had 3 world level fights, which he very narrowly lost.

I guess the tiebreaker is that vanes has been inactive. But way better? Nope.

[4truth]

Jacobs vs Sulecki is a solid fight, don't really get all the negativity about that one

I don't get it either.

[BillyBoxing]

Sulecki fought most of his career at middleweight. He's fought as high as 168. Vanes is a career junior middleweight.

True middleweights CAN'T make 154.

Who cares he has fought some polish 168 bum...

[Mammoth]

True middleweights CAN'T make 154.

Sure thing, BillyFaggot.

[Derranged]

In other news, homosexuals are gay.

[xhiddenx87]

Two watchable fights. Both are not good opponents

[Illmatic94]

Vanes lands an uppercut from hell..

Down goes Golovkin !

[Bjl12]

Both awful... but Jacobs-Sulecki is less awful

Solecki is at least a Top 10 MW, undefeated, and active. Vanes isn't Top 10 JMW and has never fought at MW...hes coming off a loss and 2 year layoff and taking the fight on 2 weeks notice.

Solecki is not best opposition, but is light years ahead of Vanes in terms of competitiveness

[Mammoth]

Solecki is at least a Top 10 MW, undefeated, and active. Vanes isn't Top 10 JMW and has never fought at MW...hes coming off a loss and 2 year layoff and taking the fight on 2 weeks notice.

Solecki is not best opposition, but is light years ahead of Vanes in terms of competitiveness

If Vanes was active I would have him in the top 10 at jr middle.... if that means anything.

[Bjl12]

If Vanes was active I would have him in the top 10 at jr middle.... if that means anything.

????

If he was active we would see if he can still compete...

Hes not active and might be journeyman status. 2 years off, 3 L at JMW, fighting Top 3 MW on 2 weeks notice.

Great fight.