Should Canelo and Thurman stay rank in p4p rankings?

[Blue54]

Thurman has been in active for a year now he has been hurt which is understandable but its starting to get ridiculous he still has both belts but not fighting in a year idk.

Canelo we all know his scandal but is that enough to prop him all together or does his previous work overshadow all of that?

[_Rexy_]

his previous work doesn't overshadow anything if there is doubt cast on his previous work.

[chrisJS]

No. Thurman is basically semi-retired and even still not one of the best 10 fighters in the sport when he's actually fighting.

Canelo is but he should be dropped from all rankings including the mythical ones like p4p.

[Dodger07]

Neither of them should be ranked in any top 10 pfp lists.

[Boksfan]

If you are inactive for a year you should not be ranked.

[Larry the boss]

who has Thurman ranked p4p?

[Beercules]

If you are inactive for a year you should not be ranked.

I agree with this.

[Metho_4u]

who has Thurman ranked p4p?

Not me, as far as I'm concerned hes got 2 decent wins, a cherry picker and close fight with porter, who Kell brook obviously already beat. If Thurman were to beat spence, he'd break the top 10, if he beat Crawford and Spence, then top 3

[Metho_4u]

I agree with this.

An injury is different if there's proof imo, but still... he doesn't belong top 10 anyway.

[Boksfan]

An injury is different if there's proof imo, but still... he doesn't belong top 10 anyway.

Injury is no different, inactive for a year, out of the ranking. That's one of the reasons boxing sucks.