martirosyan beat trout three times, bradley and berto in amateurs

[Mammoth]

Vanes doesn't suck but this fight does

[Madison Boxing]

Lara or charlo fights vanes. Great fight. Competitive. GGG fights vanes. Terrible fight. Hmmm

Seems that way. Don't understand how what anything I've said makes some fanboy. It's a fact h3s been more than competitive with fighters that this forum rate very highly.

[stealthradon]

Lara or charlo fights vanes. Great fight. Competitive. GGG fights vanes. Terrible fight. Hmmm

No, because now lay-off matters. When Canelo fought a 2 year lay-off in Kirkland, it didn't matter.

[xhiddenx87]

Mission failed dude. Its not a good matchup. And its not vanes fault, he is pretty decent

[STREET CLEANER]

and lost very close fight to charlo (which reportedly could have gone either way), a split decision to andrade and a competitive fight to erislandy lara and has never been stopped.

what a ****ing bum!!!!!!!

Are you justifying this ****? What has he done in the pros and what has he done lately?

I don't mind the fight because I know they want a soft touch because more than likely they will be fighting Canelo in September. But to Jazz this up is a far stretch.

[Scipio2009]

and lost very close fight to charlo (which reportedly could have gone either way), a split decision to andrade and a competitive fight to erislandy lara and has never been stopped.

what a ****ing bum!!!!!!!

Try to defend the move all you want, Vanes Martirosyan is a junior middleweight fighter who's come up short at 154 whenever he's had to fight anyone above C-level.

Vanes Martirosyan is maybe a C+ junior middleweight who hasn't had a fight in two years, scheduled to fight a B/B+ middleweight in Golovkin, and you're creaming yourself over it, lol.

[b00g13man]

Try to defend the move all you want, Vanes Martirosyan is a junior middleweight fighter who's come up short at 154 whenever he's had to fight anyone above C-level.

Vanes Martirosyan is maybe a C+ junior middleweight who hasn't had a fight in two years, scheduled to fight a B/B+ middleweight in Golovkin, and you're creaming yourself over it, lol.

And he hasn't fought in two years...

[NearHypnos]

And he hasn't fought in two years...

And lost that fight to boot. He’s not won a fight in three years or so?


“But - But Charlo and Lara fought him!”

Yeah man..2 and 3 years ago and lost. Just because Lara and Charlo (who’s largely unproven) did it years ago doesn’t make it okay.

Lets be real... how many people even count the Vanes win as a big/good win for Charlo or Lara? :/


The unified mw boogeyman shouldn’t be fighting charlo/lara leftovers years later. I love GGG but it’s a horrid fight. :/ Vanes has zero going for him if we’re being honest.

[VERSION1 (V1)]

No, because now lay-off matters. When Canelo fought a 2 year lay-off in Kirkland, it didn't matter.

so you was cool with that right

[b00g13man]

And lost that fight to boot. He’s not won a fight in three years or so?


“But - But Charlo and Lara fought him!”

Yeah man..2 and 3 years ago and lost. Just because Lara and Charlo (who’s largely unproven) did it years ago doesn’t make it okay.

Lets be real... how many people even count the Vanes win as a big/good win for Charlo or Lara? :/


The unified mw boogeyman shouldn’t be fighting charlo/lara leftovers years later. I love GGG but it’s a horrid fight. :/ Vanes has zero going for him if we’re being honest.

OP is the worst kind of hypocrite. Back then, he railed against the idea of Lara vs GGG, claiming he hadn't done anything at 160. Now all of a sudden, one of Lara's leftovers who also hasn't done anything at 160, and never did much at 154 anyway, and has been inactive for two years is a good fight?