Comments Thread For: Ryota Murata vs. Blandamura - CompuBox Historical Review

Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • BIGPOPPAPUMP
    Franchise Champion
    Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
    • Sep 2003
    • 46545
    • 2,259
    • 334
    • 5,493,285

    #1

    Comments Thread For: Ryota Murata vs. Blandamura - CompuBox Historical Review

    Ryota Murata (last 3 fights) threw an anemic 32 punches per round (23 fewer than the middle. avg.), but landed 40.3% of his total punches, while opponents landed just 14.6%. The economical Murata also landed 52.2% of his power punches, while opponents landed 23.5%. Blandamura (last 2 fights) is busier than Murata, but far less accurate (22.3% of his total punches).
    [Click Here To Read More]
  • Eddy Current
    Banned
    Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
    • Jun 2017
    • 8720
    • 297
    • 406
    • 143,787

    #2
    I'm excited to wake up early on a Sunday morning to watch some live boxing!

    I heard Rob Brant may get a crack at Murata for his title later this year.

    Comment

    • sammybee
      Undisputed Champion
      Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
      • May 2008
      • 3747
      • 121
      • 2
      • 29,462

      #3
      I expect Murata to go for the big fights after winning this one.

      Comment

      • Tatabanya
        Split Draw Addict
        Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
        • Jul 2015
        • 10487
        • 4,283
        • 1,995
        • 61,641

        #4
        Do not expect fireworks here. As 98% of Italian fighters, Blandamura will be easily wiped out. As soon as they meet a fighter over the tomato can level, most Italians reveal their actual value - which almost always corresponds to "mediocre".

        Comment

        • Zaroku
          RIP BIg Dawg Larry & Walt
          Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
          • Mar 2009
          • 53366
          • 4,761
          • 10,926
          • 389,015

          #5
          It’s about to start now on TV here in Tokyo.

          Comment

          Working...
          TOP