Bigger hypejob Pacquiao, Golovkin, Broner, Mora or Lomachenko?

[hectari]

Who the hell ever hyped up Mora?

He won the contender and got hyped up

[Derranged]

He won the contender and got hyped up

Nowhere near as much as the other turds.

[Fay]

GGG and Loma,, everyone always knew broner was **** nobody hyped him up

[VatoMulatto]

Broner is the only hypejob on that list. Mora? He has never been hyped up.

[Dosumpthin]

You lost credibility here. I can't believe you think chavez-Whitaker, Holyfield-Lewis 1 were fair decisions.

Stop it. 95+% people had the fight scored correctly. Judges often get fights wrong.

You're all over the place. Responding to your own questions and answers. Get it together. Focus.



You said "Manny handled Bradley easily in 2012."


I pointed out your blatantly false statement as an example as to why Manny is considered a hypejob.


Because delusional Pact@rds refused to acknowledge Mannys failures. Do it long enough the failures turn into "handled easily".

[chrisJS]

You're all over the place. Responding to your own questions and answers. Get it together. Focus.



You said "Manny handled Bradley easily in 2012."


I pointed out your blatantly false statement as an example as to why Manny is considered a hypejob.


Because delusional Pact@rds refused to acknowledge Mannys failures. Do it long enough the failures turn into "handled easily".

LOL I'm far from a Pacquaio fan and I was actually at that fight and made money with a drunken bet on Bradley but it's hard to give Bradley more than 3 rounds on an objective scorecard which is what I had.

Pacquaio lost 4 to Marquez but he didn't lost to Bradley. He handled him easily each time.

[Dosumpthin]

LOL I'm far from a Pacquaio fan and I was actually at that fight and made money with a drunken bet on Bradley but it's hard to give Bradley more than 3 rounds on an objective scorecard which is what I had.

Pacquaio lost 4 to Marquez but he didn't lost to Bradley. He handled him easily each time.

Have you ever had a debate where you didn't mention you were at some fight?


Is that where a convo with you always leads to?


I'm assuming you brought up the other fights because @ some point you would say "I was ringside for Holyfield Lewis!" Assuming - I can guarantee that was your intentions.




Listen idiot. You're on a boxing forum - not a YouTube video. No one here cares how many rookie cards or posters you've collected.




Probably never took the headgear off.

[Chuckguy]

GGG and Loma,, everyone always knew broner was **** nobody hyped him up

This post was hilarious

[chrisJS]

Have you ever had a debate where you didn't mention you were at some fight?


Is that where a convo with you always leads to?


I'm assuming you brought up the other fights because @ some point you would say "I was ringside for Holyfield Lewis!" Assuming - I can guarantee that was your intentions.




Listen idiot. You're on a boxing forum - not a YouTube video. No one here cares how many rookie cards or posters you've collected.




Probably never took the headgear off.

Never went to Lewis-Holyfield stop lying. So your "guarantee" is a load of ****. Been to a ton of fights though. I mentioned Pacquaio-Bradley as an example of I even wanted Bradley to win and put money on Bradley (you know in Las Vegas you can bet on sports) and even I knew Pacquaio won easy.

Never collected a "rookie card" either and not into the posters thing. Maybe that's the closest you've got to the fights hence why you bring it up. Sorry you don't get to that many fights they are a lot of fun.

Also LOL at the fake rank you pull implying you've actually boxed. Nobody cares if you did or didn't. But to use a fake rank to act like you know how to score a fight better is comedy. Nobody cares what you say period you alt.

[hectari]

Nowhere near as much as the other turds.

lol hey is that really Oscar in the hamburglar suit?