In boxing terms it's clearly Joshua who brings the most to the table. AJ brings 4 belts, Wilder brings the one which is historically most desirable. AJ is offering Wilder a chance to be undisputed in one fight rather than the several it's taken AJ to unify.
Commercially AJ is the proven box office draw, fills a 90k stadium and does massive PPV business. He out earns Wilder by roughly 10 to 1.
Considering that AJ could offer a very low percentage, but Wilder's a very exciting highlights reel fighter who is a good talker. He offers the prospect of helping AJ break into the US market and also raising the take for this fight beyond AJ's previous highest take.
So pay him more than the bare minimum. 35% would get the fight signed in my view, ensure both fighters are lavishly rewarded for the risks they take and crucially stop the mandatories derailing the road to a unified undisputed champion.
Fair deal is whatever the A-side offers.
If Wilder is the one who fought and beat Klitschko,
he would have been the A-side.
Again, fair deal is whatever the A-side offers.
I won't give a f** if Wilder offers AJ 10%.
Comment