Comments Thread For: Shields Offers Charlo, Lara To Replace Canelo, Fight Golovkin

[Breno G]

ggg brings no money to the table either
All he has are the belts...

that's debatable, but he's not a cash cow like Canelo that's for sure. (or was...)

[Breno G]

Its called your mandatory defense. Charlo is ranked number 1. I am a believer that both Charlo boys can own their division. I like GGG but I think Charlo takes him.

right, but mandatory defenses are delayed to infinity sometimes

[aboutfkntime]

GG isn't a hype job and GG and his people are not the first to have a fighter rejected as an opponent. And don't ever compare PED's to a trainer and manager's pick of a replacement fighter.

don't be ridiculous

more fighters die from being mis-matched, than die because their opponent was using steroids

once again..... steroids are illegal, for safety reasons..... and Munguia was rejected, for safety reasons lol

there is no difference whatsoever, the bottom line is the same

both of those fights got canned because it was NOT a level playing field, and would not have been a fair fight

again..... NOBODY is supporting/condoning steroid abuse

just pointing out that the fake " outrage ", which manifested when it appeared that Canelo would have an advantage over Golvokin..... immediately disappeared when it appeared that Golovkin would have an advantage over Munguia

NOT supporting steroid abuse..... just proving that I am way too real for the gimpy fanboys

Golovkin fans need to give themselves (another) uppercut

[aboutfkntime]

I like Lara a lot...but as you know styles make fights...and the only reason Canelo and Jacobs could survive 12 rounds with GGG was they moved and boxed well, as Lara would do, but they also had great power to make him hesitant. Lara is not in the same league as Canelo and Jacobs as far as power, we all know that.

Again I have no problem with Lara coming up to fight GGG. I think Lara would actually take the fight as well. But he would probably want a lot of money and to this date he hasn't come up 160 - so earning the fight is irrelevant.

And Lara has never fought at 160? Why should I take him serious that he was actually wanting to fight GGG. Lara is the b-side...if you want the fight, give the a-side what they want and do the fight. I suspect Lara would rather take on other fighters for similar money rather than go to 160 and face anyone, let alone GGG. But again I do think Lara would take the fight, he just would want more money than he is worth financially.

what the FCUK gives you the right to insist that he would not ?

FACT: Lara would fight anyone, go watch the Williams fight

here is another fact.....

FACT: you do not have the right to question Lara, when your boy was too CHICKEN to call his "bluff"

and stop making childish excuses to defend lilG's **** opponent selection..... Rosado did not have to prove himself, and neither did Kell Brook

[aboutfkntime]

And honestly I think Lara-GGG would go somewhat like GGG-Brook or GGG-Monroe...Lara would get drawn into a dog-fight and he would be outgunned...I just think he is too small and not a big enough puncher to keep GGG off of him...if you are looking for a GBH to beat GGG I would honestly look elsewhere

who cares what you think

FACT: you have been wrong before, and will be wrong again

is there anyone else that Golovkin does not need to fight, simply because YOU think that he could win?

do you think that Golovkin can beat Canelo..... ?

right, then I guess we don't need to see that fight either lol

[aboutfkntime]

Dude speak English. You're embarrassing yourself and everyone who looks like you.

And again I like Charlo - but if/when GGG knocks him out, you'll throw him under the bus faster than all of y'all did when Andrade almost lost to Culcay....you'll just try and find another GBH to beat Golovkin

just what we needed..... another p1ss-stain alt

[Raggamuffin]

don't be ridiculous

more fighters die from being mis-matched, than die because their opponent was using steroids

once again..... steroids are illegal, for safety reasons..... and Munguia was rejected, for safety reasons lol

there is no difference whatsoever, the bottom line is the same

both of those fights got canned because it was NOT a level playing field, and would not have been a fair fight

again..... NOBODY is supporting/condoning steroid abuse

just pointing out that the fake " outrage ", which manifested when it appeared that Canelo would have an advantage over Golvokin..... immediately disappeared when it appeared that Golovkin would have an advantage over Munguia

NOT supporting steroid abuse..... just proving that I am way too real for the gimpy fanboys

Golovkin fans need to give themselves (another) uppercut

It's like you're not even talking to me, and that you're talking to other posters and quoting me, lmao. You don't have all of the stats on ring deaths so don't make a blank statement like that, that you can't back.

[aboutfkntime]

It's like you're not even talking to me, and that you're talking to other posters and quoting me, lmao. You don't have all of the stats on ring deaths so don't make a blank statement like that, that you can't back.

name 1 fighter who died in the ring because his opponent was using steroids

I will wait

again, all I said was..... the fake " outrage ", which manifested when it appeared that Canelo would have an advantage over Golovkin..... immediately disappeared when it appeared that Golovkin would have an advantage over Munguia.....

I wasn't even referring to you, I was referring to the fake outrage

[Raggamuffin]

name 1 fighter who died in the ring because his opponent was using steroids

I will wait

again, all I said was..... the fake " outrage ", which manifested when it appeared that Canelo would have an advantage over Golovkin..... immediately disappeared when it appeared that Golovkin would have an advantage over Munguia.....

I wasn't even referring to you, I was referring to the fake outrage

You invented your own fake ass “vent” and now you’re questioning me over some ****** **** lmao. You nor I have data that supports anything because you won’t ever find out the exact true numbers. Yeah we get it, GG tried to find an opponent and you think that they wanted to kill an inexperienced fighter I guess I don’t know.

[aboutfkntime]

You invented your own fake ass “vent” and now you’re questioning me over some ****** **** lmao. You nor I have data that supports anything because you won’t ever find out the exact true numbers. Yeah we get it, GG tried to find an opponent and you think that they wanted to kill an inexperienced fighter I guess I don’t know.

name 1 fighter who died in the ring because his opponent was using steroids

because..... I CAN name a fighter who died in the ring because he was badly overmatched

so..... not all of us are lacking in data

forget demanding "proof"..... it is clearly obvious that Golovkin fighting Munguia would be a horrible mismatch

FACT: that fight was refused for safety reasons

not making a big deal out of it, just saying.....