Unfortunately I suspect you are correct.
I got the impression the article was US centric, and correctly identifying that the US needs a big party. The UK just had the equivalent of an all-night rave so are more 'we just had a big party, what do you mean ?'.
With Joshua able to milk his status without Wilder, it leaves Wilder needing Joshua a lot more than Joshua needs Wilder (indeed, Joshua doesn't need Wilder at all).
I've got no doubts Hearn will be advising Joshua to duck Wilder this year, and probably next too, and only way it happens is if Joshua mans up to Hearn and tells him to make the fight regardless. And that might happen - lets see who really calls the shots between Joshua/Hearn.
I got the impression the article was US centric, and correctly identifying that the US needs a big party. The UK just had the equivalent of an all-night rave so are more 'we just had a big party, what do you mean ?'.
With Joshua able to milk his status without Wilder, it leaves Wilder needing Joshua a lot more than Joshua needs Wilder (indeed, Joshua doesn't need Wilder at all).
I've got no doubts Hearn will be advising Joshua to duck Wilder this year, and probably next too, and only way it happens is if Joshua mans up to Hearn and tells him to make the fight regardless. And that might happen - lets see who really calls the shots between Joshua/Hearn.
Comment