Originally posted by chrisJS
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Who are the 10 greatest UK fighters of all time?
Collapse
-
-
Only in my lifetime watching boxing. Which is 1999ish onwards
1. Lennox
2. Calzaghe
3. Naz
4. Joshua
5. Froch
6. Frampton
7. Tyson Fury
8. David Haye
9. Hatton
10. Johnny Nelson (lol) To be fair his inexplicably brilliant fight with Ezra Sellers is one of the first fights I can remember loving. Other than that his Entertainer nickname was ironic. But his reign was long and after such a crap start to his career he fascinates me.
BJS, George Groves might surpass him.
Comment
-
Originally posted by chrisJS View PostYeah, Hamed deserves strong consideration. Conteh also an excellent shout. His lifestyle probably held him back somewhat but he posted some excellent wins.
Turpin also could be considered for the bottom of the list. Benn and Eubank in the mix too but then after that a bit of a drop off but led by Frampton, Hatton and Froch if we are talking career accomplishments. I'd have those three between 16-20 if I created such a list with some research.
The fact that Hamed pretty much unified the featherweight division, and went over and conquered America which not too many Brits do would make him a top 10 guy for me.
It’s hard to rank a lot of the earlier guys for me as I’ve read a lot about them but not exactly watched a plethora of footage of a few of them, so it’s hard to compare their skill sets to the more modern fighters.
Turpin is another tough one to rank as he’s in the same sort of category as Stracey and Honeyghan in the sense that one outstanding win is what defines their legacies. The fact that Turpin beat (an albeit under-motivated) SRR in the middle of a near decade long, 90 fight undefeated streak puts him in the position of 10-15 or possibly in contention for top 10 IMO.
Comment
-
Originally posted by _Rexy_ View PostI always felt that Naz was more of a "show" than a prizefighter, and that he retired once he finally had a real fight.
But I'm also not British, so who knows lol. I've just always felt he was like Kiss (they are a show, not a rock band)
What was so impressive about Naz though was that he essentially through the boxing rule book out the window, he done bizarre perhaps ****** things in the ring but he had that much natural ability, athleticism, speed and power he managed to get away with it and beat some damn good fighters along the way like Kelley, Vasquez, Soto etc.
Comment
-
Originally posted by RJJ-94-02=GOAT View PostYeah Conteh never lived the life so somewhat underachieved, but in terms of ability and talent is right up there IMO. Being from Liverpool I am a little bias towards Conteh though.
The fact that Hamed pretty much unified the featherweight division, and went over and conquered America which not too many Brits do would make him a top 10 guy for me.
It’s hard to rank a lot of the earlier guys for me as I’ve read a lot about them but not exactly watched a plethora of footage of a few of them, so it’s hard to compare their skill sets to the more modern fighters.
Turpin is another tough one to rank as he’s in the same sort of category as Stracey and Honeyghan in the sense that one outstanding win is what defines their legacies. The fact that Turpin beat (an albeit under-motivated) SRR in the middle of a near decade long, 90 fight undefeated streak puts him in the position of 10-15 or possibly in contention for top 10 IMO.
Good point on Stracey. He obviously is remembered for the Napoles win but he never got HOF consideration which is probably right but Barry McGuigan did get in and Stracey had a perhaps as good a career. He also beat some top, top Welterweights of that time like Ernie Lopez, Hedgemon Lewis and Roger Menetrey. Napoles was definitely over the hill but surely that win trumps the Pedroza one given that Napoles was a greater fighter (than Pedroza) and he did it in hostile territory. Perhaps McGuigan's charisma and what that particular night meant gave him the edge when it came to HOF balloting.
I think Hamed over time has been romanticized a little too much. I think he was probably the Featherweight of the 90's and outside of Marquez, Barrera, Morales, Lomachenko and Pacquaio likely wouldn't lose to any modern era (last 20-25 years) fighters at Featherweight or below but I think some go a little overboard on his talent level and actual skill set. He was a huge puncher though and yes, he did win a bunch of belts and was a very dominant champion for a long time against a strong caliber of opposition. Did he get the best out of his potential? Probably not because his hunger went (literally) away and when he hit adversity he didn't give it a shot to get back.
Comment
-
I have Naz at 2 after Lennox with Calazaghe at 3 followed by Froch.
Reason: Calazaghe didn't leave UK till later in his career. Didn't fight RJJ in his prime. Naseem went to the US and defended his title FIFTEEN TIMES winning IBF, WBO, WBC and technically the WBA. Lennox unified the HW title, and beat Holyfield. Vastly underrated HW. Same as TJames Toney, underrated, but that's for another thread.Last edited by iamboxing; 04-04-2018, 12:40 PM.
Comment
-
in my time -
1. lennox
2. honeyghan
3. buchanan
4. mcCauley
5. hamed
6. froch
7. mcGuigan
8. hatton
9. calzaghe
10. conteh
Potential entry - Joshua
To add outside my time, you'd need to throw in ted lewis, turpin and possibly farr, and for sure not forgetting the ginger ninja himself... Bob.
There'll be others I am not aware of outside my time too.Last edited by DreamFighter; 04-04-2018, 12:56 PM.
Comment
-
Originally posted by iamboxing View PostI have Naz at 2 after Lennox with Calazaghe at 3 followed by Froch.
Reason: Calazaghe didn't leave UK till later in his career. Didn't fight RJJ in his prime. Naseem went to the US and defended his title FIFTEEN TIMES winning IBF, WBO and WBC and the technically the WBA. Lennox unified the HW title, and beat Holyfield.
Comment
Comment