Wilder's win over Ortiz is MUCH better than Joshua's UD over Parker...

[Vlad_]

I might admit that I am subjective when it comes to Eastern Euro fighters, so when you see me defending Kovalev, GGG, Loma, Usyk, Gassiev, Bivol, Gvozdyk, etc... That is me being maybe subjective but I always try to bring in facts and truth to my arguments...

When it comes to Heavyweights, I don't really have a preference either way. When Joshua beat Klitschko, I said it was a bad stoppage, but a good performance from AJ...

I saw the Wilder-Ortiz fight a few weeks ago, and I saw the Joshua-Parker fight today. Wilder had flaws in his performance, but he also had the flu and came in at a cruiser weight of 214lbs.... And he KO'd Ortiz.

Joshua on the other hand, has proven to be overrated after his performance against Parker. He was slightly better than the much smaller man in front of him,. who managed to stop his TKO streak.

So Wilder beats Joshua by KO any day of the week, and AJ and Hearn are exposing themselves to be nothing more than pink vagins...

[Johnston]

Both proved to be beatable but I agree wilders win was more impressive

[Robbie Barrett]

Coming within seconds of losing and getting outboxed by an old, fat contender with high blood pressure is better than beating a young title holder. Sure............

[Gillie]

More exciting...absolutely. More meaningful...I don't think so.

[Caught Square]

It was definitely more exciting.

[JimRaynor]

On paper and in reality Parker was the better win. He was 26 and undefeated with a belt. Wilder however showed more in his fight than Joshua did in this one.

[Vlad_]

Coming within seconds of losing and getting outboxed by an old, fat contender with high blood pressure is better than beating a young title holder. Sure............

Keep up that objectivity, Robbie!

[ELPacman]

It was absolutely more credible against Ortiz. Ortiz on the Wilder night could of beat the Parker tonight. I also consider Ortiz one of the better technical ****ers of the heavyweight division. He was southpaw too. The fact that Wilder who we discredit as being a windmilling awkward fighter KO'd him mean a heck of a lot. He can be behind on points and it will not deter his determination or the freakish power. Any round he is dangerous.

[TouchyAndalou]

I might admit that I am subjective when it comes to Eastern Euro fighters, so when you see me defending Kovalev, GGG, Loma, Usyk, Gassiev, Bivol, Gvozdyk, etc... That is me being maybe subjective but I always try to bring in facts and truth to my arguments...

When it comes to Heavyweights, I don't really have a preference either way. When Joshua beat Klitschko, I said it was a bad stoppage, but a good performance from AJ...

I saw the Wilder-Ortiz fight a few weeks ago, and I saw the Joshua-Parker fight today. Wilder had flaws in his performance, but he also had the flu and came in at a cruiser weight of 214lbs.... And he KO'd Ortiz.

Joshua on the other hand, has proven to be overrated after his performance against Parker. He was slightly better than the much smaller man in front of him,. who managed to stop his TKO streak.

So Wilder beats Joshua by KO any day of the week, and AJ and Hearn are exposing themselves to be nothing more than pink vagins...

Your argument is basically "Fighter A beat fighter Y better than fighter B beat fighter Z, therefore fighter A beats fighter B." This is the thought process of a very dumb person.

[Vlad_]

Your argument is basically "Fighter A beat fighter Y better than fighter B beat fighter Z, therefore fighter A beats fighter B." This is the thought process of a very dumb person.

You're misunderstanding my thoughts. I simply resumed both performances that happened in a short timeframe...

The Wilder beating AJ part is simply my opinion, not based only on said performances...