travsB, i explained this already. im not the one claiming i want a cleaner sport!! im not the one claiming im leading the way!! so i can say what the fcvk i want!! that's the good thing about this! LOL. i didnt make no claims about i want a cleaner sport then switch up and gave a cheater a pass!!!!
hmmm no mention about meth use from the man himself!!!
Your video consist of Floyd expressing an opinion.
He never declares Manny used any specific drug.
Here we have Roger declaring a specific drug (Meth) and stating USADA will find out what he is using. This is enough to prove malice which is required in a defamation lawsuit.
Manny then took them to court. They had no proof. Manny won.
7 years later Manny admits to using METH
Kept his METH use a secret when mattered most. Even sued his accusers.
Manny then took them to court. They had no proof. Manny won.
7 years later Manny admits to using METH
Kept his METH use a secret when mattered most. Even sued his accusers.
What a scam bag
"I don't think he can beat Lil' Floyd with steroids in him or not," Mayweather Sr. said. "He don't have that kind of talent. He don't have that kind of skill, whatever he has in him.
"I think they're pushing Pacquiao a little too much, even if he's got 'roids in his body. The steroids aren't going to make him no faster. It's going make him relentless and hit strong, but that's it. It ain't going to put no knowledge in your head."
"I don't think he can beat Lil' Floyd with steroids in him or not," Mayweather Sr. said. "He don't have that kind of talent. He don't have that kind of skill, whatever he has in him.
"I think they're pushing Pacquiao a little too much, even if he's got 'roids in his body. The steroids aren't going to make him no faster. It's going make him relentless and hit strong, but that's it. It ain't going to put no knowledge in your head."
And again you are posting a video of someone expressing an "opinion" which is not considered sufficient evidence to establish a defamation of character lawsuit.
The most damaging audio/video evidence is when Roger presented information as a "fact" and even specified METH as the drug Manny is using.
This is what Mannys attorney used in order to establish malice.
Problem was Roger did not have proof nor could he at least point to a reasonable source to support his public statement. Any judge would agree Roger was acting with malicious intent to harm Pacquiao career.
So yeah. Better believe Manny sat in the court room hiding his dirty little secret.
And again you are posting a video of someone expressing an "opinion" which is not considered sufficient evidence to establish a defamation of character lawsuit.
The most damaging audio/video evidence is when Roger presented information as a "fact" and even specified METH as the drug Manny is using.
This is what Mannys attorney used in order to establish malice.
Problem was Roger did not have proof nor could he at least point to a reasonable source to support his public statement. Any judge would agree Roger was acting with malicious intent to harm Pacquiao career.
So yeah. Better believe Manny sat in the court room hiding his dirty little secret.
7 years later he admitted to it.
Disgusting individual.
the video was posted to show you that they accused pac of taking roids NOT meth! has nothing to do with defamation! i posted that simply for the fact that sr. accused him of using roids in that video!
so you're saying for 5-6 years the mayweathers wasnt accusing manny of using roids but meth instead? final answer?
Comment