Comments Thread For: Mayweather: Canelo Should Be Allowed To Fight Golovkin!

[travestyny]

**** off. You got the message. Floyd is making himself look like a fool. He's got a rep as being anti drugs and now he's coming out saying a fighter that failed a test should be allowed to fight.

No need for you to go all extra, bruh. It was just a little jab because you called him a fool and made the same mistake that all of the pacRoaches make that can't figure out the difference between "you're" and "your" since they've been on this site.

Just thought that was funny.

And what he is saying is they can make sure he is CLEAN before the fight takes place, just like your boy WesternChimp saying he should be allowed to fight.

So is WesternChimp equally wrong? What's your opinion?

[travestyny]

travsB stop hiding and log off your dosumpthin account!

Hiding? LMAO. You already got destroyed, dude. Do I need to sit here and keep spamming with the proof you embarrassed yourself?

[TonyGe]

No need for you to go all extra, bruh. It was just a little jab because you called him a fool and made the same mistake that all of the pacRoaches make that can't figure out the difference between "you're" and "your" since they've been on this site.

Just thought that was funny.

And what he is saying is they can make sure he is CLEAN before the fight takes place, just like your boy WesternChimp saying he should be allowed to fight.

So is WesternChimp equally wrong? What's your opinion?

My opinion is go sit on your thumb and rotate..

[travestyny]

My opinion is go sit on your thumb and rotate..

Don't want to answer? LMAO. You got hurt real bad over a little jab

Next time you call someone a fool, learn the difference between "you're" and "your." That's all I'm saying. Then, teach Spoon the difference, because he's been struggling with that for years.


Bye bye, now

[TonyGe]

Don't want to answer? LMAO. You got hurt real bad over a little jab

Next time you call someone a fool, learn the difference between "you're" and "your." That's all I'm saying. Then, teach Spoon the difference, because he's been struggling with that for years.


Bye bye, now

Good riddance..

[travestyny]

Good riddance..

Aren't you the same clown that thinks Pacquiao won the Mayweather fight? And also thought Jack Johnson could make the same amount of money fighting Black fighters as White fighters?

LMAO. Forgot about that. That says a whole lot about what you know...or don't know.


So long

[travestyny]

What's the point of random testing if you just ignore it when someone gets caught?

And this coming from the guy who was basically the reason for the testing even being so present in boxing.

Weird.

He never said ignore the test. He simply said keep testing up until the fight so that it's certain Canelo is going into the fight CLEAN.

This was trace amounts of Clenbuterol, which improves breathing and helps you lose weight. He had about, what, 12 days of training with two whole months before the fight at this point. A WADA specialist says the amount is consistent with tainted meat, and another specialist says he received no benefit from such a small amount of Clen, much less receiving a benefit from it 2 whole months later.

The plan was already to do what Mayweather suggested. Rev up the testing to make certain that he goes into the fight clean. As it stands right now, there is no way of knowing if he did this maliciously or if it were a mistake, and that's why the plan was to do what Mayweather is suggesting, pending the hearing, of course.

That's why this statement was much ado about nothing. The only problem was a few PacRoaches went off on it....only to be caught out there saying the same exact thing. I can understand someone saying that if you're caught, no matter what, you should not be allowed to fight. No problem. But what I can't understand is someone who says he should be allowed to fight (and stating that they definitively believe Canelo was cheating), and then going back and saying Mayweather is wrong for his statement but they are not. It's the same damn opinion and reeks of hypocrisy. So at least your opinion holds merit, because you haven't been caught out there like those other dudes. lol.

[tokon]

wtf............... i thought this guy wanted to 'clean up the sport'

Terrible hypocrisy from Floyd here.

[TonyGe]

Aren't you the same clown that thinks Pacquiao won the Mayweather fight? And also thought Jack Johnson could make the same amount of money fighting Black fighters as White fighters?

LMAO. Forgot about that. That says a whole lot about what you know...or don't know.


So long

Yes I said Pacquiao beat Mayweather but I didn't say Jack Johnson could make the same money fighting black fighters. I said he didn't fight them because it was all about the money. I also said that if he would have fought a black fighter that was less threatening to the racist majority they would have supported the fight. You obviously have no reading comprehension.

[travestyny]

Yes I said Pacquiao beat Mayweather but I didn't say Jack Johnson could make the same money fighting black fighters. I said he didn't fight them because it was all about the money. I also said that if he would have fought a black fighter that was less threatening to the racist majority they would have supported the fight. You obviously have no reading comprehension.

Did you not say that with this "less threatening to the racist majority" black fighter, that he would have done well financially? You seem to have left that part out, didn't you? Unless that's what you mean by "supported the fight." Funny that you chose to state that differently here.

The racist majority would have supported watching Jack Johnson fight another black fighter for a substancial amount of money for the title that they believed belonged to a white fighter? You're joking, right?

This shows your level of intelligence, dumb dumb