Klitchko Wasnt A Unification Bout Says Wilder

Collapse
X
Collapse
  • Page of 9
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
Previous 1 2 3 4 9 template Next
  • juggernaut666
    Banned
    Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
    • Mar 2015
    • 15544
    • 1,226
    • 500
    • 87,472
    #1

    Klitchko Wasnt A Unification Bout Says Wilder

    This clowns current Boxing Voice rant really shows how dumb he is . Hes now clearly ducking Joshua and according to him he paved the way for the HW division .........


    About his quote of Klitchko ? Well dummy it WAS a unification bout bc more than one belt was up for grabs ,you dont have to hold a belt for a sanctioned unification bout thats why it WAS one .

    So no , Joshua just didnt GRAB belts waiting for him from a NON champion . He defeated Klitchko the guy YOU actually waited on to AGE , remember that one ?
    Last edited by juggernaut666; 04-16-2018, 05:13 AM.
    Tags: bout, klitchko, unification, wilder
    • Eff Pandas
      Banned
      Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
      • Apr 2012
      • 52131
      • 3,624
      • 2,147
      • 1,635,919
      #2
      Klitschko had a belt?!?!?!

      I thought that was for some vacant belt + Joshua's belt. To me, maybe I'm crazy or just not enough of a Joshua fanboy, a unification involves two guys holding one or more belt.

        Comment

        • mlac
          Undisputed Champion
          Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
          • Feb 2014
          • 20293
          • 1,620
          • 1,473
          • 210,093
          #3
          this Juicehua V bum squad debate is really boring, we should relocate all the fat yank fanboys & AJ Cucksquad to a lockable part of the forum and let them argue for eternity.

            Comment

            • _Rexy_
              Undisputed Champion
              Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
              • Jan 2018
              • 27934
              • 6,140
              • 3,585
              • 358,040
              #4
              Originally posted by Eff Pandas
              Klitschko had a belt?!?!?!

              I thought that was for some vacant belt + Joshua's belt. To me, maybe I'm crazy or just not enough of a Joshua fanboy, a unification involves two guys holding one or more belt.
              ^^^This^^^

                Comment

                • Eff Pandas
                  Banned
                  Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
                  • Apr 2012
                  • 52131
                  • 3,624
                  • 2,147
                  • 1,635,919
                  #5
                  Originally posted by mlac
                  this Juicehua V bum squad debate is really boring, we should relocate all the fat yank fanboys & AJ Cucksquad to a lockable part of the forum and let them argue for eternity.
                  Solid idea. I 2nd this.

                  I wanna see this fight, but Wilder & Joshua fanboys need to go. They making Floyd & Manny fanboys from back in the day look like geniuses.

                    Comment

                    • Vinnykin
                      Undisputed Champion
                      Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
                      • Feb 2016
                      • 5150
                      • 200
                      • 118
                      • 78,217
                      #6
                      Klitschko was still one of the top guys in the division.

                      Wilder can't say anything after Stiverne and his subsequent defences.... hahahhaha

                        Comment

                        • Pigeons
                          Banned
                          Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
                          • Jun 2013
                          • 14753
                          • 1,211
                          • 714
                          • 37,430
                          #7
                          Originally posted by Eff Pandas
                          Klitschko had a belt?!?!?!

                          I thought that was for some vacant belt + Joshua's belt. To me, maybe I'm crazy or just not enough of a Joshua fanboy, a unification involves two guys holding one or more belt.
                          The WBA started 2016 with Fury as Super champion, Chagaev as Regular champion, and Ortiz as Interim champion. Ortiz vacated his belt instead of fighting his mandatory. Browne beat Chagaev, got stripped for juicing, Chagaev was briefly reinstated before getting stripped for refusing to pay a sanctioning fee. Fury vacated his belt after testing positive for coke. The WBA went from 3 champs to 0 at the end of 2016.

                          In 2017, they sanctioned Joshua-Klitschko for the Super belt and Charr-Ustinov for the Regular belt.

                            Comment

                            • juggernaut666
                              Banned
                              Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
                              • Mar 2015
                              • 15544
                              • 1,226
                              • 500
                              • 87,472
                              #8
                              Originally posted by Eff Pandas
                              Klitschko had a belt?!?!?!

                              I thought that was for some vacant belt + Joshua's belt. To me, maybe I'm crazy or just not enough of a Joshua fanboy, a unification involves two guys holding one or more belt.
                              No it dont , it involves a match that has more than one belt on the line .

                              Fanboy??? GTFO kid ......go look at the rules !
                              Last edited by juggernaut666; 03-28-2018, 07:56 PM.

                                Comment

                                • yammy25
                                  Undisputed Champion
                                  Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
                                  • Sep 2016
                                  • 2648
                                  • 136
                                  • 49
                                  • 18,103
                                  #9
                                  He was IBF.. became IBF and WBA super.. and ibo if you bother with it.. but he had 1 belt. Then had 3 belts... That's the actual definition of unifying belts.. by putting 1+ more together .

                                  Alabama education system showing its cards here...

                                    Comment

                                    • Eff Pandas
                                      Banned
                                      Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
                                      • Apr 2012
                                      • 52131
                                      • 3,624
                                      • 2,147
                                      • 1,635,919
                                      #10
                                      Originally posted by juggernaut666
                                      No it dont , it involves a match that has more than one belt .
                                      So Joshua vs Takam was a unification fight?

                                        Comment

                                        Previous 1 2 3 4 9 template Next
                                        Working...
                                        TOP

                                        Sign In

                                        Forgot password?

                                        Register

                                        Get in on the latest boxing conversations in our Forum and comment on articles.
                                        JOIN NOW