Wlad lost all his belts when he lost to Fury so there's no way he could have been in a unification fight right afterwards. He was fighting for a vacant belt so Wilder is right.
Klitchko Wasnt A Unification Bout Says Wilder
Collapse
-
-
No it wasn't but klitschko had said he would only fight if the WBA put it on the line which is what held the fight being announced for a long while.
Eventually they did and he unification fight was born. Not sure why we are debating it now ? I mean Joshua has unified again since then!Comment
-
There’s plenty of ways. These orgs are the most corrupt crap organizations in history, so yeah don’t be surprised.Comment
-
Never heard that ever in my life. Its SOMETHING different I'll give you that, but its clearly no unification fight.
A unifying can't happen with only one champ going in. It needs two mfers with one or more belt each. Otherwise what are we unifying exactly? I'd say not a damn thing.
http://www.sportsdefinitions.com/box...ion-fight.html
That's my definition and I believe I know more about boxing and have as much authority as the anonymous person who posted that mistaken definition at the site you linked to.Last edited by kafkod; 04-16-2018, 03:38 PM.Comment
-
Did the fight make Joshua a unified champion? If yes then it was a unification fight.
It really isn't that difficult.
By your logic a fight for a vacant title isn't a world title fight.Comment
Comment