Originally posted by Bjl12
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Comments Thread For: Nacho: Others Tested Postive and Fought - Let Canelo Fight GGG!
Collapse
-
-
Originally posted by chrisJS View PostHow is he ducking Jacobs? Had he re-matches Jacobs you said he's ducking Canelo. He said he wants the fight to go on but the commission are doing the investigation. It's not GGG's fault Canelo figures he needed an extra edge and cheated. You were also criticizing GGG for wanting to go through with it a couple of weeks ago lol. See how dumb that looks. You've made your mind up and whatever course a fighter you dislike takes will be criticized even if you wanted that course. It's what delegates people who enjoy the sport for what it is (like me) from people like you who have always got to hate someone.
https://www.******.com/488171-golovk...fall-jeopardy/
However, why didn't GGG just rematch Danny Jacobs...the most competitive fight of his career?
HE. DIDN'T. WANT. THAT. WORK.
Talks about fighting BJS, but had 0 interest in rematching Danny. Hilarious. Given a GIFT decision and runs with his hands held high and tail right between his legs...LMFAO
Now he's looking for a way out against the "big muscles" of Ca$hnelo
Comment
-
Originally posted by Bjl12 View PostYou trash all whined about how Canelo "made Gennady wait" because Gennady wanted to fight in June against BJS:
https://www.******.com/488171-golovk...fall-jeopardy/
However, why didn't GGG just rematch Danny Jacobs...the most competitive fight of his career?
HE. DIDN'T. WANT. THAT. WORK.
Talks about fighting BJS, but had 0 interest in rematching Danny. Hilarious. Given a GIFT decision and runs with his hands held high and tail right between his legs...LMFAO
Now he's looking for a way out against the "big muscles" of Ca$hnelo
You played yourself and the posts are there. You complained and called GGG a disgrace to Boxing because he wanted to go through with Canelo despite his failed test and now you said he's looking for a way out because the commission are investigating. You had your angles already regardless of how it played out. You upped your ****** level on this one and are now 100% ******. After all you are the poster who said Barrera was shot in 2003 but Mosley entered his absolute peak in 2010. LOL. There's levels of ****** and you are in the hall of fame with your own wing.
Comment
-
Let him fight.................then suspend both of them for boring me!
Sick of both of these diva's, this kid Canelo should have 50 bouts by now and should be twice as good as he is!
Tripe G's legs look done, he simple has lost a quick step and refuses to double jab. Without a sharp up & down jab and being able to quickly double it up he becomes a stereo typed Euro styled guy! You both made some good money............go away!
Ray
Comment
-
Originally posted by chrisJS View PostAnother LIE from you. Dude you make so many assumptions and all are lies. It wasn't a gift as most pretty much everyone of sound thinking scored it for GGG. It was competitive but I know you and if the fighter you dislike doesn't score a KO he's lost the fight. Saunders had/has a title and Jacobs doesn't and Saunders pays about the same as Jacobs.
You played yourself and the posts are there. You complained and called GGG a disgrace to Boxing because he wanted to go through with Canelo despite his failed test and now you said he's looking for a way out because the commission are investigating. You had your angles already regardless of how it played out. You upped your ****** level on this one and are now 100% ******. After all you are the poster who said Barrera was shot in 2003 but Mosley entered his absolute peak in 2010. LOL. There's levels of ****** and you are in the hall of fame with your own wing.
I provided evidence via his betting odds with Floyd Mayweather. Those odds were among the most competitive Floyd ever had.
Emmanuel Steward, HOF trainer and broadcaster at HBO, said he looked at the fight as 50/50 and defended that statement when your fellow jackass, Larry Merchant, stated otherwise. Merchant has always been a history revisionist in addition to being racist and **********. In other words, he's trash; like you and your ilk
Mosley was coming off a route of yet another hypejob, Margarito, who you and many others thought was "the deal". I had to tell ya'll time and time again he was a good solid C and maybe C+ level guy.
Gennady is C+ or B-. He's just looked exceptionally better because he's had a career of fighting part-time fighters and inched by Danny Jacobs due to a flash knockdown before losing, decisively, to Canelo (a JMW).
He chose not to go pro when MW was relevant and robbed himself of the chance to really prove himself. His own Khazakh fault
Comment
-
Originally posted by Bjl12 View PostNever said anything about Mosley being prime in 2010. I simply said he wasn't "washed up".
I provided evidence via his betting odds with Floyd Mayweather. Those odds were among the most competitive Floyd ever had.
Emmanuel Steward, HOF trainer and broadcaster at HBO, said he looked at the fight as 50/50 and defended that statement when your fellow jackass, Larry Merchant, stated otherwise. Merchant has always been a history revisionist in addition to being racist and **********. In other words, he's trash; like you and your ilk
Mosley was coming off a route of yet another hypejob, Margarito, who you and many others thought was "the deal". I had to tell ya'll time and time again he was a good solid C and maybe C+ level guy.
Gennady is C+ or B-. He's just looked exceptionally better because he's had a career of fighting part-time fighters and inched by Danny Jacobs due to a flash knockdown before losing, decisively, to Canelo (a JMW).
He chose not to go pro when MW was relevant and robbed himself of the chance to really prove himself. His own Khazakh fault
I probably rated Margarito lower than you. However he was a 4-1 favorite over Mosley which if you go by odds is a fair reflection of where Mosley was at and that was before his 16 month layoff which at age 38 is a big deal.
Comment
-
Originally posted by chrisJS View PostCanelo can't be A level if he had the sane world saying he lost clearly.
I probably rated Margarito lower than you. However he was a 4-1 favorite over Mosley which if you go by odds is a fair reflection of where Mosley was at and that was before his 16 month layoff which at age 38 is a big deal.
Floyd hadn't fought a "real WW" besides Baldomir. Judah was small, Hatton was small, Marquez was small.
People said Floyd was ducking Margs - a real WW who was big - and Mosley demolished him. Bad.
I guess oddsmakers said..."Well, Floyd ain't fought a real WW yet. He may have been ducking Margs, Cotto, Mosley, etc. and just edged an over-the-hill Oscar". Odds were accurate FOR THAT TIME PERIOD.
Mosley should've been in that fight more than he was though. Aside from Round 2 - the worst Floyd round I've ever seen - he literally did zero. He arguably won 1st round, but was swept from 3-12.
Literally no Plan B for that fight
And you're trying to act like this is all me saying this. Emmanuel Steward and professional betting odds said this. I'm just supporting it.
It's YOU (a pac**** in denial and ball juGGGler) who is trying to rewrite history.
I give props where they're due. I don't ****eat.
Pacquiao had incredible career especially at lower weights. However, like Floyd Mayweather, Pac has a resume that can easily be picked apart. They both (ESPECIALLY Pac) took a lot of fights at "the right time".
Gennady is a good, solid fighter. He's just not no world beater. Beating a Marc Rubio or Dominic Wade (whether he's on house arrest or not lmfao) does not mean anything to me.
Floyd's win over Mosley is better than any Pac win (at WW) other than Bradley (including the joke of a fight against Margarito)
Comment
-
Originally posted by Bjl12 View PostRight. And Mosley demolished him.
Floyd hadn't fought a "real WW" besides Baldomir. Judah was small, Hatton was small, Marquez was small.
People said Floyd was ducking Margs - a real WW who was big - and Mosley demolished him. Bad.
I guess oddsmakers said..."Well, Floyd ain't fought a real WW yet. He may have been ducking Margs, Cotto, Mosley, etc. and just edged an over-the-hill Oscar". Odds were accurate FOR THAT TIME PERIOD.
Mosley should've been in that fight more than he was though. Aside from Round 2 - the worst Floyd round I've ever seen - he literally did zero. He arguably won 1st round, but was swept from 3-12.
Literally no Plan B for that fight
And you're trying to act like this is all me saying this. Emmanuel Steward and professional betting odds said this. I'm just supporting it.
It's YOU (a pac**** in denial and ball juGGGler) who is trying to rewrite history.
I give props where they're due. I don't ****eat.
Pacquiao had incredible career especially at lower weights. However, like Floyd Mayweather, Pac has a resume that can easily be picked apart. They both (ESPECIALLY Pac) took a lot of fights at "the right time".
Gennady is a good, solid fighter. He's just not no world beater. Beating a Marc Rubio or Dominic Wade (whether he's on house arrest or not lmfao) does not mean anything to me.
Floyd's win over Mosley is better than any Pac win (at WW) other than Bradley (including the joke of a fight against Margarito)
Didn't try to re-write any history. That's not my thing. Anyway I couldn't really give a **** about a childish and repetitive Floyd vs. Pac thing. I'll leave that to the simpletons and nutthuggers (like you).
Comment
Comment