Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Comments Thread For: Nacho: Others Tested Postive and Fought - Let Canelo Fight GGG!

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #81
    Originally posted by Bjl12 View Post
    This has nothing to do with those fighters.

    Gennady has a HORRIFIC resume. That is largely NOT his fault, but it's also just how things happened for him.

    Part of that IS HIS FAULT since he wanted to stay amateur so long. He could've been looking for Pavlik, Taylor, Sergio in his mid 20's instead of fighting with headgear.

    GENNADY'S FAULT

    Instead he has Willie Monroe Jr. and Dominic Wade and Marc Antonino Rubio.









    Who? His "best wins" have ENORMOUS asterisks. Danny Jacobs fight was extremely close (could've gone either way) and Danny Jacobs is on NO P4P list. Hell half the forum tried to rationalize Danny is a "weight cheat" for reasons of Gennady's shortcoming.

    LMFAO.

    Then his fight with Canelo (which I didn't find close at all, 8-4 Canelo since Gennady basically did nothing but chase all night) ended in a draw. Gift draw for Gennady IMHO although others have a different opinion. I respectfully disagree, but is fine.

    Kell Brook, a Top 5 WELTERweight, moved up 13 pounds since Gennady wouldn't budge...1 pound?

    WOW. WHAT A WARRIOR.

    LMFAO. Dude is such a dud. Anyone who has Gennady in their To 10 PFP has no idea what boxing is. Gennady is a fringe Top 10 fighter. Never captured all belts at only class he fought at and found reasons to NOT take high profile fights (i.e., Andre Ward, etc.) and he's ducking a rematch with Danny Jacobs (closest fight) while actively looking for a way out against his other closest fight.

    What. A. Warrior.
    How is he ducking Jacobs? Had he re-matches Jacobs you said he's ducking Canelo. He said he wants the fight to go on but the commission are doing the investigation. It's not GGG's fault Canelo figures he needed an extra edge and cheated. You were also criticizing GGG for wanting to go through with it a couple of weeks ago lol. See how dumb that looks. You've made your mind up and whatever course a fighter you dislike takes will be criticized even if you wanted that course. It's what delegates people who enjoy the sport for what it is (like me) from people like you who have always got to hate someone.

    Comment


    • #82
      Originally posted by chrisJS View Post
      How is he ducking Jacobs? Had he re-matches Jacobs you said he's ducking Canelo. He said he wants the fight to go on but the commission are doing the investigation. It's not GGG's fault Canelo figures he needed an extra edge and cheated. You were also criticizing GGG for wanting to go through with it a couple of weeks ago lol. See how dumb that looks. You've made your mind up and whatever course a fighter you dislike takes will be criticized even if you wanted that course. It's what delegates people who enjoy the sport for what it is (like me) from people like you who have always got to hate someone.
      You trash all whined about how Canelo "made Gennady wait" because Gennady wanted to fight in June against BJS:

      https://www.******.com/488171-golovk...fall-jeopardy/

      However, why didn't GGG just rematch Danny Jacobs...the most competitive fight of his career?

      HE. DIDN'T. WANT. THAT. WORK.

      Talks about fighting BJS, but had 0 interest in rematching Danny. Hilarious. Given a GIFT decision and runs with his hands held high and tail right between his legs...LMFAO

      Now he's looking for a way out against the "big muscles" of Ca$hnelo

      Comment


      • #83
        Originally posted by Bjl12 View Post
        You trash all whined about how Canelo "made Gennady wait" because Gennady wanted to fight in June against BJS:

        https://www.******.com/488171-golovk...fall-jeopardy/

        However, why didn't GGG just rematch Danny Jacobs...the most competitive fight of his career?

        HE. DIDN'T. WANT. THAT. WORK.

        Talks about fighting BJS, but had 0 interest in rematching Danny. Hilarious. Given a GIFT decision and runs with his hands held high and tail right between his legs...LMFAO

        Now he's looking for a way out against the "big muscles" of Ca$hnelo
        Another LIE from you. Dude you make so many assumptions and all are lies. It wasn't a gift as most pretty much everyone of sound thinking scored it for GGG. It was competitive but I know you and if the fighter you dislike doesn't score a KO he's lost the fight. Saunders had/has a title and Jacobs doesn't and Saunders pays about the same as Jacobs.

        You played yourself and the posts are there. You complained and called GGG a disgrace to Boxing because he wanted to go through with Canelo despite his failed test and now you said he's looking for a way out because the commission are investigating. You had your angles already regardless of how it played out. You upped your ****** level on this one and are now 100% ******. After all you are the poster who said Barrera was shot in 2003 but Mosley entered his absolute peak in 2010. LOL. There's levels of ****** and you are in the hall of fame with your own wing.

        Comment


        • #84
          Let him fight.................then suspend both of them for boring me!

          Sick of both of these diva's, this kid Canelo should have 50 bouts by now and should be twice as good as he is!
          Tripe G's legs look done, he simple has lost a quick step and refuses to double jab. Without a sharp up & down jab and being able to quickly double it up he becomes a stereo typed Euro styled guy! You both made some good money............go away!

          Ray

          Comment


          • #85
            Originally posted by chrisJS View Post
            I'll take Conte's theory over yours.

            I'll take just about any theory over yours on just about any subject.
            Thats not my theory, thats the theory of the science

            Comment


            • #86
              Of course he says this since he conspired with JMM to use PEDS in preparation for the last Pac fight.

              Comment


              • #87
                Originally posted by chrisJS View Post
                Another LIE from you. Dude you make so many assumptions and all are lies. It wasn't a gift as most pretty much everyone of sound thinking scored it for GGG. It was competitive but I know you and if the fighter you dislike doesn't score a KO he's lost the fight. Saunders had/has a title and Jacobs doesn't and Saunders pays about the same as Jacobs.

                You played yourself and the posts are there. You complained and called GGG a disgrace to Boxing because he wanted to go through with Canelo despite his failed test and now you said he's looking for a way out because the commission are investigating. You had your angles already regardless of how it played out. You upped your ****** level on this one and are now 100% ******. After all you are the poster who said Barrera was shot in 2003 but Mosley entered his absolute peak in 2010. LOL. There's levels of ****** and you are in the hall of fame with your own wing.
                Never said anything about Mosley being prime in 2010. I simply said he wasn't "washed up".

                I provided evidence via his betting odds with Floyd Mayweather. Those odds were among the most competitive Floyd ever had.

                Emmanuel Steward, HOF trainer and broadcaster at HBO, said he looked at the fight as 50/50 and defended that statement when your fellow jackass, Larry Merchant, stated otherwise. Merchant has always been a history revisionist in addition to being racist and **********. In other words, he's trash; like you and your ilk

                Mosley was coming off a route of yet another hypejob, Margarito, who you and many others thought was "the deal". I had to tell ya'll time and time again he was a good solid C and maybe C+ level guy.

                Gennady is C+ or B-. He's just looked exceptionally better because he's had a career of fighting part-time fighters and inched by Danny Jacobs due to a flash knockdown before losing, decisively, to Canelo (a JMW).

                He chose not to go pro when MW was relevant and robbed himself of the chance to really prove himself. His own Khazakh fault

                Comment


                • #88
                  Originally posted by Bjl12 View Post
                  Never said anything about Mosley being prime in 2010. I simply said he wasn't "washed up".

                  I provided evidence via his betting odds with Floyd Mayweather. Those odds were among the most competitive Floyd ever had.

                  Emmanuel Steward, HOF trainer and broadcaster at HBO, said he looked at the fight as 50/50 and defended that statement when your fellow jackass, Larry Merchant, stated otherwise. Merchant has always been a history revisionist in addition to being racist and **********. In other words, he's trash; like you and your ilk

                  Mosley was coming off a route of yet another hypejob, Margarito, who you and many others thought was "the deal". I had to tell ya'll time and time again he was a good solid C and maybe C+ level guy.

                  Gennady is C+ or B-. He's just looked exceptionally better because he's had a career of fighting part-time fighters and inched by Danny Jacobs due to a flash knockdown before losing, decisively, to Canelo (a JMW).

                  He chose not to go pro when MW was relevant and robbed himself of the chance to really prove himself. His own Khazakh fault
                  Canelo can't be A level if he had the sane world saying he lost clearly.

                  I probably rated Margarito lower than you. However he was a 4-1 favorite over Mosley which if you go by odds is a fair reflection of where Mosley was at and that was before his 16 month layoff which at age 38 is a big deal.

                  Comment


                  • #89
                    Originally posted by chrisJS View Post
                    Canelo can't be A level if he had the sane world saying he lost clearly.

                    I probably rated Margarito lower than you. However he was a 4-1 favorite over Mosley which if you go by odds is a fair reflection of where Mosley was at and that was before his 16 month layoff which at age 38 is a big deal.
                    Right. And Mosley demolished him.

                    Floyd hadn't fought a "real WW" besides Baldomir. Judah was small, Hatton was small, Marquez was small.

                    People said Floyd was ducking Margs - a real WW who was big - and Mosley demolished him. Bad.

                    I guess oddsmakers said..."Well, Floyd ain't fought a real WW yet. He may have been ducking Margs, Cotto, Mosley, etc. and just edged an over-the-hill Oscar". Odds were accurate FOR THAT TIME PERIOD.

                    Mosley should've been in that fight more than he was though. Aside from Round 2 - the worst Floyd round I've ever seen - he literally did zero. He arguably won 1st round, but was swept from 3-12.

                    Literally no Plan B for that fight

                    And you're trying to act like this is all me saying this. Emmanuel Steward and professional betting odds said this. I'm just supporting it.

                    It's YOU (a pac**** in denial and ball juGGGler) who is trying to rewrite history.

                    I give props where they're due. I don't ****eat.

                    Pacquiao had incredible career especially at lower weights. However, like Floyd Mayweather, Pac has a resume that can easily be picked apart. They both (ESPECIALLY Pac) took a lot of fights at "the right time".

                    Gennady is a good, solid fighter. He's just not no world beater. Beating a Marc Rubio or Dominic Wade (whether he's on house arrest or not lmfao) does not mean anything to me.

                    Floyd's win over Mosley is better than any Pac win (at WW) other than Bradley (including the joke of a fight against Margarito)

                    Comment


                    • #90
                      Originally posted by Bjl12 View Post
                      Right. And Mosley demolished him.

                      Floyd hadn't fought a "real WW" besides Baldomir. Judah was small, Hatton was small, Marquez was small.

                      People said Floyd was ducking Margs - a real WW who was big - and Mosley demolished him. Bad.

                      I guess oddsmakers said..."Well, Floyd ain't fought a real WW yet. He may have been ducking Margs, Cotto, Mosley, etc. and just edged an over-the-hill Oscar". Odds were accurate FOR THAT TIME PERIOD.

                      Mosley should've been in that fight more than he was though. Aside from Round 2 - the worst Floyd round I've ever seen - he literally did zero. He arguably won 1st round, but was swept from 3-12.

                      Literally no Plan B for that fight

                      And you're trying to act like this is all me saying this. Emmanuel Steward and professional betting odds said this. I'm just supporting it.

                      It's YOU (a pac**** in denial and ball juGGGler) who is trying to rewrite history.

                      I give props where they're due. I don't ****eat.

                      Pacquiao had incredible career especially at lower weights. However, like Floyd Mayweather, Pac has a resume that can easily be picked apart. They both (ESPECIALLY Pac) took a lot of fights at "the right time".

                      Gennady is a good, solid fighter. He's just not no world beater. Beating a Marc Rubio or Dominic Wade (whether he's on house arrest or not lmfao) does not mean anything to me.

                      Floyd's win over Mosley is better than any Pac win (at WW) other than Bradley (including the joke of a fight against Margarito)
                      Dude you are obsessed with Pacquaio and Floyd. Let that **** go. As far as it goes for me **** both guys because their fans to me are responsible for ruining boxing forums (with the exception of private ones I am a member of and ban fanatical fans of either) you just gotta let that go. Obsessed with a **** saga and even worse fight. I'll be honest I hated (well can't use that word but strongly disliked) Pac before Floyd (I was probably a Floyd fan before 99% here). I rooted for Floyd to beat him but barely cared about the fight. Just didn't want Pacquaio to get that one up over Marquez.

                      Didn't try to re-write any history. That's not my thing. Anyway I couldn't really give a **** about a childish and repetitive Floyd vs. Pac thing. I'll leave that to the simpletons and nutthuggers (like you).

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X
                      TOP