Comments Thread For: Parker's Promoter Issues Firm Warning For Officials To Be Fair

[twosweethooks]

Trust judges ? Baloney ! I am pulling for the underdog!

[McNulty]

The American elected official Steve Weisfeld was one of the Judges for Joshua-Klitschko, he had Klitschko winning 95-93 ; in addition Parker has a fellow countryman as a judge Ian Scott -- well done by Mr. Higgins and Duco Events.

Still that Euro-ref is suspect.

It's not where the refs/officials are from, its about the promoters involved. Some have a strong grip like Top Rank and some don't like Golden Boy.

Look at the Horn fight. The judge with the 117-111 was from the US. Second judge was the the US and the 3rd judge was from Argentina.

[Boksfan]

Am I missing something? Wilder has knocked out every opponent he faced except for the dominant UD over Stiverne to win the title. Those are the true FACTS like him or not...

He is also a protected cherry picker and paying judges to work in his favour.

[1hourRun]

It's not where the refs/officials are from, its about the promoters involved. Some have a strong grip like Top Rank and some don't like Golden Boy.

Look at the Horn fight. The judge with the 117-111 was from the US. Second judge was the the US and the 3rd judge was from Argentina.

Yeah you got a point, but I checked Steve Weisfeld resume and I determined that hes fair and very experienced at this level ; his score of Joshua vs. Klitschko ( as noted ) is proof of his neutral outlook in judging a Joshua fight.

[boxxsingh]

He missed the knockdown in the second round tho.

Same ref that was in AJ vs Wlad fight.

[1hourRun]

Same ref that was in AJ vs Wlad fight.

Your point sir? you brought up the official in question....you know what I'm starting to think you are the other poster in this thread, that idiot Boksfan -- the two of you are really slow and cant keep up. I'm done with both of you clowns, you bore me.

[bluemax]

Wilder is the Real Deal and so is Joshua

Am I missing something? Wilder has knocked out every opponent he faced except for the dominant UD over Stiverne to win the title. Those are the true FACTS like him or not...

Lets not forget he knocked Ortiz out, the same guy Joshua's camp avoided like he had the plague. I still believe Ortiz was the third best heavyweight out there and was a threat to any title holder. Wilder stepped up while Joshua didn't. No reflection on Joshua especially after he beat Whyte who is no walk in the park but Wilder is no tomatoe can either

[joe strong]

He is also a protected cherry picker and paying judges to work in his favour.

Since when has a judge been needed when 39 out of 40 opponents have been knocked out? Any blind judge could see how badly he beat Stiverne the first time. I get it you hate Wilder & wear your Joshua pajamas to bed at night but exactly when were the judges needed? I'm just asking for a simple answer. When exactly were these paid off judges needed when he knocked out 39 of 40 opponents?

[juggernaut666]

Since when has a judge been needed when 39 out of 40 opponents have been knocked out? Any blind judge could see how badly he beat Stiverne the first time. I get it you hate Wilder & wear your Joshua pajamas to bed at night but exactly when were the judges needed? I'm just asking for a simple answer. When exactly were these paid off judges needed when he knocked out 39 of 40 opponents?

You think the judges would have not had a swarm of fans ,media , journalists ,etc asking WTF if the fight went 12 rounds ,having Wilder in basically a shut out where Ortiz needed a K.O to win ?


You dont have Joshua PJ's ??

[Boksfan]

Since when has a judge been needed when 39 out of 40 opponents have been knocked out? Any blind judge could see how badly he beat Stiverne the first time. I get it you hate Wilder & wear your Joshua pajamas to bed at night but exactly when were the judges needed? I'm just asking for a simple answer. When exactly were these paid off judges needed when he knocked out 39 of 40 opponents?

If you can't admit he got help from judges in last fight, you either blind or deluded.