Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Comments Thread For: WBA Prez: Canelo is Innocent, NSAC Hearing is a Bit Unfair

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #21
    Originally posted by Redd Foxx View Post
    While I agree with him, I think taking that public stance is a mistake. He should say that they trust the commission to do their job, bla, bla, bla.
    Some people don't know how to maintain appearances...
    That's what I would of done??? Now they look like greedy, dirty MF'ers who give 2 shts about anything else but the $$$$

    Comment


    • #22
      Originally posted by BoxingIsGreat View Post
      I don't like this fight because the first one bored me a lot. However, I hope it happens for GGG's sake. The guy has invested so much time and energy waiting for such big money fight. He stands to lose too much.

      It'd be cool if NSAC canceled the fight, then GGG would have grounds to sue Canelo.

      War GGG!
      The 1st fight bored you??? I liked it a lot and felt the rematch was going to be even better.

      Comment


      • #23
        This is disgusting from the wba, the guy fails two drug test but a hearing into the matter is unfair... what a joke

        Comment


        • #24
          What he says makes sense though. People aren't reading, he's just asking why is NSAC blowing smoke up people's ass? Make the decision and be done with it. This is how I understood it.

          "I think that the due process of the commission was to attack the case immediately. Why? Because it seems they are reacting to the comments of Canelo and Golovkin from the prior week, but I do not understand this because if the commission already has the drug test results that came after the adverse result of Canelo, so why are they mentioning a temporary suspension.... they could [make a decision on all of this] privately. Why raise this publicly, to say that they are going to make a temporary suspension when it's just as easy to make a definitive suspension. If they have enough evidence [to make a decision], it seems strange, strange to me."

          Comment


          • #25
            It's not a sport.

            Boxing is ruled by deception and money. Fans idolize their fighters. Willing to believe any story to support "their guy".

            Failing a drug test should cancel the fight or cause a suspension. It is logical consequence but boxing is not a sport. It is way for people to make money.

            What will happen is there will be a meeting to give the appearance of objectivity and fairness, but that a mirage and scam for people to clasp onto as the fight will ensue.

            When you have power and money. it is the same playbook.

            **** you , Pay me.

            Comment


            • #26
              WBA/C statements have a target audience of one, Canelo. This is their way to suck up to a ginger PPV star. Noone seriously believes in NSACs so called investigation. It all a sham to keep up the appearances.

              Prove me wrong and ban Canelo. Him juicing is beyond any doubt.

              Comment


              • #27
                LUCK IS FOR THE MEDIOCRE MY FRIEND! Lol

                Comment


                • #28
                  It’s not even shocking anymore.

                  Comment


                  • #29
                    Originally posted by -Kev- View Post
                    What he says makes sense though. People aren't reading, he's just asking why is NSAC blowing smoke up people's ass? Make the decision and be done with it. This is how I understood it.
                    You absolutely right and I agree with the fact that NSAC are trying to blow up smoke, they already had the test results but we all know this is BS and the suspension isn’t going to be a permanent one.

                    Comment


                    • #30
                      Defending their juicing Diva as usual.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X
                      TOP