Originally posted by Sid-Knee
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Comments Thread For: Dillian Whyte Wants Deontay Wilder Next, Calls for June Fight
Collapse
-
-
Originally posted by Sid-Knee View PostHaha
Joshua has...
Takam
Wlad
Brezeale
Martin
Whyte
Has Parker coming up
Wilder has...
Stiverne
Ortiz
It's quite clear who has the better resume. It has nothing to do with being a "fanboy". And that's irony anyway coming from a Wilder fan. They're the biggest fanboys on the forum. Trying to claim that Wilder has a good resume when he's had 41 fights. It's ****ing dreadful.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Shane1091 View PostWould Whyte beat the STIVERNE in their first fight? And Washington maybe he will.. But I don't rate Whyte very highly imo his fight against Choriza was a draw who top 10 easily beat D. Chorz
And yes, I think Dillian could beat the Stiverne of the first fight.
Comment
-
Originally posted by hitking View PostTakam and Martin are fringe contenders, at best. Wilder has lots of those. Breazeale and Whyte were prospects. When Wilder fought Stiverne the first time, he was a top 5 contender. Who had beaten a top 5 contender in Areola, twice. And Ortiz is arguably a better win than Klitschko. Ortiz and Klitschko fought Bryant Jennings in back-to-back fights. Who did better??? And Klitschko was coming off a loss. So exactly how is that a great win?
Martin and Takam are better than everyone on Wilder's list other than Ortiz. Don't try and dispute that.
Ortiz is a better win than Wlad is he? Hahaha yeah, sure he is. That win over Jennings proves it, even though Wlad beat him first. Haha.Last edited by Sid-Knee; 03-25-2018, 04:28 PM.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Raggamuffin View PostStiverne was more qualified than anyone on the stiff one's resume. The bums that you named who you think are good are ****en bums. Joshua has Wlad and now Parker and Wilder has Stiverne and Ortiz. The rest of who Joshua fought you can flush them down the toilet along with yourself lmao. You going H.A.M because every day you hate that Joshua's cowardly ass gets ****ted on by posters. Hammmmmm, goooo Haaaaaaaaaaam!!! Hahahahahaha lol.
Stiverne had only beaten that nobody Arreola.
Tell me who Arreola beat to be a legit top 10?
This should be good.
Comment
-
Originally posted by hitking View PostTakam and Martin are fringe contenders, at best. Wilder has lots of those. Breazeale and Whyte were prospects. When Wilder fought Stiverne the first time, he was a top 5 contender. Who had beaten a top 5 contender in Areola, twice. And Ortiz is arguably a better win than Klitschko. Ortiz and Klitschko fought Bryant Jennings in back-to-back fights. Who did better??? And Klitschko was coming off a loss. So exactly how is that a great win?
Comment
-
Originally posted by ashadam View PostOrtiz a better win than Klitschko are you really being serious?
Comment
-
Originally posted by Sid-Knee View PostStiverne was never top 10 for beating Arreola because Arreola was never top 10 himself. I mean, who did Arreola beat to be a legit top 10 guy?
Martin and Takam are better than everyone on Wilder's list other than Ortiz. Don't try and dispute that.
Ortiz is a better win than Wlad is he? Hahaha yeah, sure he is. That win over Jennings proves it, even though Wlad beat him first. Haha.
Comment
-
Originally posted by hitking View PostStiverne was never top 10??? You’re an idiot bro.
How did Arreola get to be a top 10 guy? Answer the question.
Beating him doesn't make you top 10. And it most certainly doesn't make you top 5 for beating him like you're trying to make out.
Comment
Comment