the other two champs are buddy buddy, tyson is buddy buddy with everybody but him - he is leading the pack whether you care to admit it or not. Why is nobody buddy buddy with him then?
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Comments Thread For: Joshua: I'm Leading The Pack, Brought Division Back To Life!
Collapse
-
Originally posted by 1hourRun View PostWhere were you back in 2015?! Deontay was already on his massive KO streak!
I remember fans complaining how Klitschko's style of Jab and grab was putting people to sleep and you were sitting at ringside watching Deontay spark Audley Harrison in your own country! and you still refuse to acknowledge your superior who you mimic and idolize!
Comment
-
Originally Posted by Oshio View Post
Who has he fought apart from Grandpa Ortiz... Kpangolo!!! You know what that is? An old weather-beaten can.
Originally posted by blizzy View PostWladimir Klitschko is older than grandpa Ortiz
However, right now AJ is the man due to the belts he holds and the fact that he dethroned the previous HW king. Yes, his comments may come across as not being humble like he said he was but who cares, it's boxing, you have to show confidence in what you do and I think he's entitled to say that whether you agree with it or not. With that said, as I've said before, if he gets past Parker, he needs to fight Wilder soon. Maybe not immediately after, but soon.
I've said it before but I'll say it again. Not fighting Wilder soon, provided Wilder keeps winning, will tarnish his legacy the same way Mayweather's win over Pacquiao is seen by many as the best business fight in terms of money but questionable from a legacy perspective. What if Mayweather fought the destructive, peak version of Pacquiao that saw the latter put a beating on Hatton, Margarito and my boy, Cotto? Most experts believe the outcome would have been different, hence why no one talks about Mayweather's "great" win over Pacquiao as if it was some sort of amazing feat.
The same question will be asked of AJ. Barring an upset by Parker, AJ vs Wilder MUST happen sooner rather than later. Anything can happen in boxing, especially with the amount of power that every single heavyweight punch carries, therefore, AJ's (and DW's for that matter) train can be derailed at any given moment.
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by bori84 View PostOriginally Posted by Oshio View Post
Who has he fought apart from Grandpa Ortiz... Kpangolo!!! You know what that is? An old weather-beaten can.
That and Ortiz had never lost prior to the Wilder fight. Klitschko had already lost to Fury and showed plenty of signs of slowing down; Ortiz was better in just about every aspect and presented the tougher challenge.
However, right now AJ is the man due to the belts he holds and the fact that he dethroned the previous HW king. Yes, his comments may come across as not being humble like he said he was but who cares, it's boxing, you have to show confidence in what you do and I think he's entitled to say that whether you agree with it or not. With that said, as I've said before, if he gets past Parker, he needs to fight Wilder soon. Maybe not immediately after, but soon.
I've said it before but I'll say it again. Not fighting Wilder soon, provided Wilder keeps winning, will tarnish his legacy the same way Mayweather's win over Pacquiao is seen by many as the best business fight in terms of money but questionable from a legacy perspective. What if Mayweather fought the destructive, peak version of Pacquiao that saw the latter put a beating on Hatton, Margarito and my boy, Cotto? Most experts believe the outcome would have been different, hence why no one talks about Mayweather's "great" win over Pacquiao as if it was some sort of amazing feat.
The same question will be asked of AJ. Barring an upset by Parker, AJ vs Wilder MUST happen sooner rather than later. Anything can happen in boxing, especially with the amount of power that every single heavyweight punch carries, therefore, AJ's (and DW's for that matter) train can be derailed at any given moment.
Comment
Comment