Fury was never on PEDs.
UKAD are are puppets of the UK establishment and they tried to stitch him up for saying things that a man in his position is not allowed to say in public, in the UK.
The only reason they were lenient with him is that they would have been sued and bankrupted for defamation and loss of earnings if they hadn't done a deal.
The only thing UKAD really had on Fury was that he told their testing team to **** off when they came to his gym to test him again after they were ordered to unsuspend his licence by a court.
UKAD registered that as Fury refusing to provide a sample, which carries an automatic 4 year ban in the UK. If he hadn't done that UKAD would have had nothing on him at all.
So they did a deal. UKAD dropped the charge of refusing to provide a sample and Fury accepted a backdated ban for the nandrolone charge, which meant he couldn't sue them over it.
UKAD are are puppets of the UK establishment and they tried to stitch him up for saying things that a man in his position is not allowed to say in public, in the UK.
The only reason they were lenient with him is that they would have been sued and bankrupted for defamation and loss of earnings if they hadn't done a deal.
The only thing UKAD really had on Fury was that he told their testing team to **** off when they came to his gym to test him again after they were ordered to unsuspend his licence by a court.
UKAD registered that as Fury refusing to provide a sample, which carries an automatic 4 year ban in the UK. If he hadn't done that UKAD would have had nothing on him at all.
So they did a deal. UKAD dropped the charge of refusing to provide a sample and Fury accepted a backdated ban for the nandrolone charge, which meant he couldn't sue them over it.
Comment