Why isn't Crawford criticised/ridiculed like GGG?
Collapse
-
-
You're an American who would rather support eastern euros more than you would support other Americans
That is 100x worseComment
-
postol has one of the weakest resume. i take what i said back, he's not even a b level, he's more of a c level. just look at the dudes resume. nothing but bums and then lucas and crawford. the guy has 2 noticeable names on his resume only and he lost to one of them.
Who in your opinion has Crawford dodged? Who should he have faced up to date?Comment
-
Comment
-
Comment
-
He lost to Crawford because Crawford is extremely good. I don't hold that against Postol. Postol was avoided for a reason and scored a dominant KO win over Mattheyse who was feared and considered a boogeyman of sorts. That was a great win.
Who in your opinion has Crawford dodged? Who should he have faced up to date?Comment
-
As you know, most boxing fans root for pbc guys or they root for non-pbc fighters. Its not much cross-over.
These trolls aren't serious, they are racist trolls. Too ignorant to hold a serious conversation about boxing. These idiots are pissed there is a black Friday after thanksgiving every year, they want a white Friday. How do blacks get a special holiday like that?
Good to see some real fans of boxing, even if we root for different fighters! Cheers my man, if we were at a bar, I'd buy you a drink.Comment
-
Comment
-
and that is relevant how? belts don't make you a draw. popularity and crossover appeal does. when GGG did 150K NSB said he wasn't even worth Clenelo's time. but Crawford does 50K and Pacquiao was still pressured to fight him.Comment
-
Comment
Comment