Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

How does Wilder deserve 40% vs AJ, if his career high is $2,1 million?

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Originally posted by CaineP View Post
    Parker got 40%.

    On the basis of what!!!!

    Please Explain this one to me!!!!
    Hearn stated multiple times they over paid for the belt. commercially parker isnt worth what he brought, but at the end of it, it makes sense financially for matchroom because itr brings higher negotiating power and commercial opportunities for AJ going forward.

    They paid charles martin 5 million to come for the IBF. exactly the same reason.

    Wilders highest purse was a non-fight court won battle where he got his percentage of a 7.2 million dollar purse split from the povetkin camp. A purse split his promotional and management team LOST when that fight went to purse bids.

    Why is he in the driving seat or why does he deserve more than 40% when 40% represents a hell of alot more than that 7.2 million dollars, that regardless of the court battle was paid and would always have been paid by the other team!?!

    Comment


    • Originally posted by SkillspayBills View Post
      The real question is why do you care how much each fighter makes? Are you a financial advisor or a boxing fan?
      I couldn't care less who gets more of what, I just want the fight to get made.
      How does the fight get made if not from the financial agreement? And maybe venue and stuffs like that.
      Some fans think fights just make themselves.

      Comment


      • Originally posted by lfc19titles View Post
        He doesn’t

        ****** wilder fans are making excuses for the fight to not happen with wilder pricing himself out

        They are getting in early defending this dumb ****

        Wilder is the d side

        He is an American hype job who almost lost to a 50 year old
        Lol

        What a joke

        He should accept 6m and get knocked out


        Aaaajhhhhh....there he is...

        The most pathetic guy out here.

        He will start a post and when you have solid arguments will put you on ignore!!!

        Dumb ****!!!!
        Last edited by CaineP; 04-01-2018, 06:28 AM.

        Comment


        • Originally posted by Buckfever View Post
          Because right now Wilder is the most lucrative option in an opponent.
          What about Fury? That would do over 100k if there was a stadium big enough in the Uk. I do want to see AJ AND Wilder next, at least the Ring belt will be on the line as well.

          Comment


          • Originally posted by yammy25 View Post
            Hearn stated multiple times they over paid for the belt. commercially parker isnt worth what he brought, but at the end of it, it makes sense financially for matchroom because itr brings higher negotiating power and commercial opportunities for AJ going forward.

            They paid charles martin 5 million to come for the IBF. exactly the same reason.

            Wilders highest purse was a non-fight court won battle where he got his percentage of a 7.2 million dollar purse split from the povetkin camp. A purse split his promotional and management team LOST when that fight went to purse bids.

            Why is he in the driving seat or why does he deserve more than 40% when 40% represents a hell of alot more than that 7.2 million dollars, that regardless of the court battle was paid and would always have been paid by the other team!?!

            This is your explanation?
            Overpaying Parker brings higher bargening power ro Matchroom? So what...people are going to ask for less now?


            If they say they overpaid....THEN THEY HAVE SET A NEW STANDARD.

            That is how it works.

            If you paid parker 40%. You should coubt your blessings if wilder settles for 40%.


            THINK about this for a minute...

            Forget wilder...if you are Povetkin and they paid Parker 40%. A guy from New Zealand and you are from Russia. 144 mio people and nationalist as ****. Would you accept anything less than 40%?

            Comment


            • Originally posted by yammy25 View Post
              Hearn stated multiple times they over paid for the belt. commercially parker isnt worth what he brought, but at the end of it, it makes sense financially for matchroom because itr brings higher negotiating power and commercial opportunities for AJ going forward.

              They paid charles martin 5 million to come for the IBF. exactly the same reason.

              Wilders highest purse was a non-fight court won battle where he got his percentage of a 7.2 million dollar purse split from the povetkin camp. A purse split his promotional and management team LOST when that fight went to purse bids.

              Why is he in the driving seat or why does he deserve more than 40% when 40% represents a hell of alot more than that 7.2 million dollars, that regardless of the court battle was paid and would always have been paid by the other team!?!
              PLEASE....explain to me how OVERPAYING Parker, brings better and higher negotiation powers for eddie the weasel !!!

              You have really broken the internt on this one!!!!!

              Comment


              • Originally posted by CaineP View Post
                This is your explanation?
                Overpaying Parker brings higher bargening power ro Matchroom? So what...people are going to ask for less now?


                If they say they overpaid....THEN THEY HAVE SET A NEW STANDARD.

                That is how it works.

                If you paid parker 40%. You should coubt your blessings if wilder settles for 40%.


                THINK about this for a minute...

                Forget wilder...if you are Povetkin and they paid Parker 40%. A guy from New Zealand and you are from Russia. 144 mio people and nationalist as ****. Would you accept anything less than 40%?
                But they didnt pay parker 40% they paid him inbetween 30-35% which is documented by Duco and david higgins.

                As for povetkin, he wont get that percentage, he is mandatory so his percentage will be lower than 40% as per the ABC org's rules so that point is moot.

                Wilder SHOULD get no more than 40%.. he DESERVES less than that. He'll be overpaid as were the others... but thats entirely different to earning or deserving that figure.

                Comment


                • Originally posted by CaineP View Post
                  PLEASE....explain to me how OVERPAYING Parker, brings better and higher negotiation powers for eddie the weasel !!!

                  You have really broken the internt on this one!!!!!
                  overpay parker... you have 3/4 belts rather than 2/4 belts.

                  Your prospective opponent has no other out in terms of unifying and becoming more powerful themselves.

                  If you think that in a commercial and marketing sense, having 3 of 4 doesnt provide higher earning potential and brand marketability than 2/4 then i cant help you.

                  Comment


                  • Originally posted by yammy25 View Post
                    overpay parker... you have 3/4 belts rather than 2/4 belts.

                    Your prospective opponent has no other out in terms of unifying and becoming more powerful themselves.

                    If you think that in a commercial and marketing sense, having 3 of 4 doesnt provide higher earning potential and brand marketability than 2/4 then i cant help you.
                    Bro... Stop it...Stop it.

                    I have a question for you...

                    At this moment....who is the fighter that will generate the highest career pay for Joshua!!!

                    Comment


                    • why the **** do fans care what a fighter takes home now?

                      jesus christ, he isn't gonna split it with you

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X
                      TOP