Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

García made history with his 4th belt.

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #91
    A lot easier to do it today with

    85 titles up for grabs, compared to yesteryear when they were just 8 titles


    And that doesn't even start with the modern techniques of cutting weight and supplements to help you grow.

    Comment


    • #92
      Originally posted by BennyST View Post
      In reality, gJeff fenech was the first, but was robbed blind by don king against Nelson.
      ..........and got owned in the rematch.

      Comment


      • #93
        Originally posted by techliam View Post
        Why can't you accept both? They aren't mutually exclusive
        Yes they are. The lineal title doesn't exist. It's a mythical title. There are four recognized world titles in boxing. Pacquiao has held one in six divisions, not eight.

        You can take the philosophical position that the belts don't make you the champion and that only beating the man who beat the man makes you champion, and that's fine. But it's apples and oranges. To count both, to get you to eight, is a complete fraud.

        Whatever merit a world title or a lineal title has, it's two separate things. The official recognized championships of boxing and a statistical curiosity tracked by purists can't then be combined to buy Pacquiao two extra divisions. He didn't win a recognized world championship in those divisions. The entire thing is a sham.

        Comment


        • #94
          Originally posted by Pigeons View Post
          Lineal titles don't disqualify alphabet belts. They're just a greater concept. Alphabet titles are the minimum requirement to claim a divisional championship, but lineal is preferred. This isn't my opinion. It's an accepted practice in boxing.
          Well clearly it's not the accepted practice in boxing, because if lineal was preferred, then fighters, promoters, networks and managers would be constantly trying to fill the vacancies, instead of completely ignoring them and continuing to focus on the real world titles.

          Comment


          • #95
            Originally posted by D4thincarnation View Post
            A lot easier to do it today with

            85 titles up for grabs, compared to yesteryear when they were just 8 titles


            And that doesn't even start with the modern techniques of cutting weight and supplements to help you grow.
            A lot easier and any fighter of U.K can win at least 3 titles in different división.

            Yeah brah

            Comment


            • #96
              Originally posted by Mexican_Puppet View Post
              A lot easier and any fighter of U.K can win at least 3 titles in different división.

              Yeah brah
              didn't ricky burns just do that so yes it is easier

              Comment


              • #97
                Originally posted by daggum View Post
                didn't ricky burns just do that so yes it is easier
                Yeah, winning one interim and a vacant title...

                Comment


                • #98
                  Originally posted by Mexican_Puppet View Post
                  A lot easier and any fighter of U.K can win at least 3 titles in different división.

                  Yeah brah
                  Duke McKenzie was a 3 weight world champ, and it was harder to do it then than now.

                  One reason why Mexican fighter can win the multiple weight titles more than Brits is because they a much smaller.

                  Brits are naturally bigger, while small Mexicans and win multiple titles with the weight difference between classes only a couple of KGs.

                  It's much more impressive to dominate a weight class than to cherry pick paper titles at multiple weights.

                  Comment


                  • #99
                    Originally posted by WBC WBA IBF View Post
                    Yes they are. The lineal title doesn't exist. It's a mythical title. There are four recognized world titles in boxing. Pacquiao has held one in six divisions, not eight.

                    You can take the philosophical position that the belts don't make you the champion and that only beating the man who beat the man makes you champion, and that's fine. But it's apples and oranges. To count both, to get you to eight, is a complete fraud.

                    Whatever merit a world title or a lineal title has, it's two separate things. The official recognized championships of boxing and a statistical curiosity tracked by purists can't then be combined to buy Pacquiao two extra divisions. He didn't win a recognized world championship in those divisions. The entire thing is a sham.
                    Lineal titles are more respected as you beat the man who beat the man. They never lost their title in the ring, and were stripped for other reasons.

                    Comment


                    • Originally posted by Mexican_Puppet View Post
                      This guy made history.

                      Only Márquez and Pacquiao won titles in 126, 130, 135 and 140 pounds.

                      Only Márquez and Morales won 4 belts in the history of mexican boxing, now García is with them in the podium.
                      Mikey was born and lives in the USA, he is an American, not a Mexican.

                      Plus, of all those names you mentioned, he has beaten the lowest quality opposition to win the titles. Lips and that zlat midget at lw? Come on now.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X
                      TOP