Comments Thread For: Erik Morales, Francisco Vargas Back Canelo: He is The Victim Here!

Collapse
Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Johnny_Roa
    Undisputed Champion
    Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
    • Jun 2010
    • 1864
    • 180
    • 146
    • 22,054

    #11
    Originally posted by WesternChamp
    would have been more credible if it was from marquez..
    Marquez hates Cantnelo

    Comment

    • ShoulderRoll
      Join The Great Resist
      Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
      • Oct 2009
      • 56385
      • 10,204
      • 5,035
      • 763,445

      #12
      Originally posted by Vlad_
      Yup, Canelo is definitely the victim here. Makes total sense. Totally.
      Someone needs to go down to Mexico and randomly test some meat samples.

      If this is truly an epidemic in the country then I don't see why Canelo should be blamed. He is telling the truth.

      Comment

      • Boxing Logic
        Undisputed Champion
        Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
        • May 2016
        • 4049
        • 442
        • 65
        • 59,061

        #13
        OMG LOLOLOLOLOL. Can't believe this headline. Two cheaters backing another cheater. Morales used to be one of my favorite boxers... in situations like these, you're better off keeping quiet. Morales had to use the meat excuse to save his career or reputation or whatever, which still, lying is lying, but you kind of understand it given that probably most of his opponents cheated too and just didn't get caught. But now for him to defend another cheater just because money is behind Canelo, even though it doesn't affect Morales' career at all? That I can't defend. No longer a Morales fan.

        Comment

        • lagako10
          Undisputed Champion
          Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
          • Apr 2014
          • 1118
          • 123
          • 15
          • 13,600

          #14
          Victim of love.... Nah nah nah
          Sad to see..... Nah nah nah

          Comment

          • Vlad_
            Banned
            Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
            • May 2017
            • 13966
            • 3,241
            • 1,478
            • 836,213

            #15
            Originally posted by ShoulderRoll
            Someone needs to go down to Mexico and randomly test some meat samples.

            If this is truly an epidemic in the country then I don't see why Canelo should be blamed. He is telling the truth.
            Because you don't get 0.6-0.8 by eating tainted meat. The cyclist who tested positive and was banned had a Clen rate of 0.05m Canelo's 0.6-0.8 is 12-16 times higher. Unless he ate 30lbs of raw tainted meat the day before testing, this is a total lie. The substance would degrade even more in cooked meat.

            Comment

            • Pigeons
              Banned
              Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
              • Jun 2013
              • 14750
              • 1,211
              • 714
              • 37,430

              #16
              Bad look for Mexicans and their people.

              Comment

              • crow511
                Contender
                Silver Champion - 100-500 posts
                • May 2009
                • 172
                • 24
                • 0
                • 6,540

                #17
                ?

                Meat contamination is a problem in mexico
                Victor conte stated 49 out of 200 slaughterhouses tested positive for clenbuteral

                Comment

                • WesternChamp
                  Banned
                  Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
                  • Oct 2015
                  • 14561
                  • 239
                  • 73
                  • 20,277

                  #18
                  Originally posted by ShoulderRoll
                  Someone needs to go down to Mexico and randomly test some meat samples.

                  If this is truly an epidemic in the country then I don't see why Canelo should be blamed. He is telling the truth.
                  is canelo the only fighter in mexico being tested? if the tainted meat is so crazy wide spread thru out mexico then why arent every other mexican fighter getting pop and why didnt canelo get pop before then. damm nowadays you can commit a murder and mofos will stand up for you i guess.

                  Comment

                  • Jab jab boom
                    Undisputed Champion
                    Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
                    • Feb 2018
                    • 11234
                    • 4,869
                    • 296
                    • 118,331

                    #19
                    If this is such a known problem in Mexico, shouldn't the highest paid fighter in the sport afford to take every precaution necessary to make sure this doesn't happen?? Btw, isn't his trainer a butcher also??

                    Comment

                    • Robbie Barrett
                      Banned
                      Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
                      • Nov 2013
                      • 40891
                      • 2,779
                      • 667
                      • 570,921

                      #20
                      Originally posted by Vlad_
                      Because you don't get 0.6-0.8 by eating tainted meat. The cyclist who tested positive and was banned had a Clen rate of 0.05m Canelo's 0.6-0.8 is 12-16 times higher. Unless he ate 30lbs of raw tainted meat the day before testing, this is a total lie. The substance would degrade even more in cooked meat.
                      The cyclist wasn't from a contaminated meat country, he would have got a pass by WADA if he was.

                      “We acknowledge that the clenbuterol meat contamination issue is unsatisfactory,” said Olivier Niggli, Director General, WADA. “Accordingly, since 2011, the Agency has carried out several research studies aimed at providing analytical means to distinguish ingestion of clenbuterol by pharmacological origin versus that of meat contamination,” he continued. “We will continue to invest in scientific research to try to solve this issue as quickly as possible,” Niggli continued. “However, in the meantime, we maintain that disciplinary proceedings against athletes with low level urinary concentrations, from countries known for significant risk of exposure, would have little to no prospect of success; and, would be very unfair to the athletes concerned.”

                      https://www.wada-ama.org/en/media/ne...rd-documentary

                      oh BTW from the same link.

                      "All of the values were below 1ng/ml and therefore in the range of potential meat contamination cases."

                      Canelos was 0.6-0.8
                      Last edited by Robbie Barrett; 03-06-2018, 10:11 PM.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      TOP