Comments Thread For: WBC, WBA Back Canelo in Test Controversy: He is Innoncent!

Collapse
Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • turnedup
    Boxing fan since 1985
    Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
    • Sep 2012
    • 10383
    • 1,935
    • 585
    • 53,504

    #91
    Note to self: Bet on a K.O. because that's the only way Golovkin will win this fight.

    Comment

    • jjsmyth87
      Undisputed Champion
      Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
      • Nov 2014
      • 2741
      • 95
      • 4
      • 10,723

      #92
      The ABC organizations will always try to back a star fighter, especially in a huge fight like this where the sanctioning fees are very high. With that being said this fight will likely generate 150 million dollars so it should be allowed to go on but afterwards there has to be something done about this. Not sure exactly what but Canelo should have known better

      Comment

      • chrisJS
        Undisputed Champion
        Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
        • Mar 2007
        • 8989
        • 331
        • 64
        • 78,477

        #93
        Originally posted by Vinnykin
        Fair enough, why did you have to be so sarcastic about me mentioning that they were quick to make their decision before an investigation then? That seems like the reply to make when you disagree with someone, not that you agreed with them.
        I wasn't being sarcastic. My bad if you interpreted it that way.

        Comment

        • chrisJS
          Undisputed Champion
          Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
          • Mar 2007
          • 8989
          • 331
          • 64
          • 78,477

          #94
          Originally posted by Raggamuffin
          I’m not a fan of either fighter so you’ll have to ask them those questions. I’m against any kinds of PEDS in boxing.
          Me neither but I noticed you gave Povetkin a nickname but not Canelo which would suggest you are attacking one guy (the euro) and giving a pass to one guy (the non euro). Your post suggested that you felt Povetkin was completely guilty and a cheat but Canelo should get a pass.

          Comment

          • dobromir
            Up and Comer
            Interim Champion - 1-100 posts
            • Mar 2010
            • 55
            • 8
            • 0
            • 6,925

            #95
            Guilty

            However you look at it, they found traces of Clenbuterol => Canelo is guilty. Perhaps it could be the meat but his team knew well that this problem has happened before with Mexican fighters and therefore should take any measures for it not to happen.

            Comment

            • devildg
              Undisputed Champion
              Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
              • Dec 2009
              • 2378
              • 124
              • 0
              • 10,363

              #96
              LMAO @ the double standard on here

              imagine if that was Pacquiao or Mayweather failing a drug test. THERE WOULD BE NO EXCUSES!!! Yet people here still believe Pac or Floyd cheated in some way despite the two of them never failing a test.

              People went crazy with that PACROID **** for years

              And here we have Canelo failing a test and using tainted beef as an excuse just as his countryman Nery also failed a test using a similar drug

              The WBA and WBC are a disgrace for pre-emptively saying Canelo is "INNOCENT"....LOL protecting this PUTO just like NERY


              Bantamweight world titleholder Luis Nery won't be stripped of his belt for a failed drug test because the WBC said it believes the positive finding was the result of food contamination.


              CHEATS are running this sport to the ground!!!! And these alphabet soups are making a mockery out of it

              Comment

              • Raggamuffin
                Undisputed Champion
                Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
                • Aug 2016
                • 8197
                • 453
                • 961
                • 43,263

                #97
                Originally posted by chrisJS
                Me neither but I noticed you gave Povetkin a nickname but not Canelo which would suggest you are attacking one guy (the euro) and giving a pass to one guy (the non euro). Your post suggested that you felt Povetkin was completely guilty and a cheat but Canelo should get a pass.
                Ive been calling Alex Headvetkin for a long time. My post was showing the hypocrisy in posters who defended Headvetkins trace amount and Canelo has trace amounts also. That’s all.

                Barrera probably used Clenbuterol against Hamed. This **** probably goes back to the freakin 80’s.

                I’ll wait until Canelos investigation is over before I crack on Headvetkins little twin brother.

                Comment

                • Don Mac
                  Interim Champion
                  Gold Champion - 500-1,000 posts
                  • Dec 2009
                  • 550
                  • 22
                  • 1
                  • 7,002

                  #98
                  WBC prez with his tongue v deep in Canelos backside.

                  Comment

                  • chrisJS
                    Undisputed Champion
                    Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
                    • Mar 2007
                    • 8989
                    • 331
                    • 64
                    • 78,477

                    #99
                    Originally posted by Raggamuffin
                    Ive been calling Alex Headvetkin for a long time. My post was showing the hypocrisy in posters who defended Headvetkins trace amount and Canelo has trace amounts also. That’s all.

                    Barrera probably used Clenbuterol against Hamed. This **** probably goes back to the freakin 80’s.

                    I’ll wait until Canelos investigation is over before I crack on Headvetkins little twin brother.
                    The investigation would only have one outcome no matter what the real results are. Do you really think any organization wants to upset Canelo given that they would get 3% of every purse? They won't stand in the way of this fight.

                    Why not point out the hypocrisy in the posters who trashed Povetkin but are siding with Canelo? There's a ton of that here too and perhaps that's worse because they had to hear all about it then and now the tables have turned whereas the folks backing Canelo were 100% without a doubt that Povetkin was a cheating scumbag.

                    Both are cheats.

                    Comment

                    • hitking
                      Undisputed Champion
                      • May 2010
                      • 11467
                      • 444
                      • 0
                      • 36,048

                      #100
                      Originally posted by kafkod
                      You're pathetic.
                      Ya mammy......

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      TOP