Note to self: Bet on a K.O. because that's the only way Golovkin will win this fight.
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Comments Thread For: WBC, WBA Back Canelo in Test Controversy: He is Innoncent!
Collapse
-
The ABC organizations will always try to back a star fighter, especially in a huge fight like this where the sanctioning fees are very high. With that being said this fight will likely generate 150 million dollars so it should be allowed to go on but afterwards there has to be something done about this. Not sure exactly what but Canelo should have known better
Comment
-
Originally posted by Vinnykin View PostFair enough, why did you have to be so sarcastic about me mentioning that they were quick to make their decision before an investigation then? That seems like the reply to make when you disagree with someone, not that you agreed with them.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Raggamuffin View PostI’m not a fan of either fighter so you’ll have to ask them those questions. I’m against any kinds of PEDS in boxing.
Comment
-
Guilty
However you look at it, they found traces of Clenbuterol => Canelo is guilty. Perhaps it could be the meat but his team knew well that this problem has happened before with Mexican fighters and therefore should take any measures for it not to happen.
Comment
-
LMAO @ the double standard on here
imagine if that was Pacquiao or Mayweather failing a drug test. THERE WOULD BE NO EXCUSES!!! Yet people here still believe Pac or Floyd cheated in some way despite the two of them never failing a test.
People went crazy with that PACROID **** for years
And here we have Canelo failing a test and using tainted beef as an excuse just as his countryman Nery also failed a test using a similar drug
The WBA and WBC are a disgrace for pre-emptively saying Canelo is "INNOCENT"....LOL protecting this PUTO just like NERY
Bantamweight world titleholder Luis Nery won't be stripped of his belt for a failed drug test because the WBC said it believes the positive finding was the result of food contamination.
CHEATS are running this sport to the ground!!!! And these alphabet soups are making a mockery out of it
Comment
-
Originally posted by chrisJS View PostMe neither but I noticed you gave Povetkin a nickname but not Canelo which would suggest you are attacking one guy (the euro) and giving a pass to one guy (the non euro). Your post suggested that you felt Povetkin was completely guilty and a cheat but Canelo should get a pass.
Barrera probably used Clenbuterol against Hamed. This **** probably goes back to the freakin 80’s.
I’ll wait until Canelos investigation is over before I crack on Headvetkins little twin brother.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Raggamuffin View PostIve been calling Alex Headvetkin for a long time. My post was showing the hypocrisy in posters who defended Headvetkins trace amount and Canelo has trace amounts also. That’s all.
Barrera probably used Clenbuterol against Hamed. This **** probably goes back to the freakin 80’s.
I’ll wait until Canelos investigation is over before I crack on Headvetkins little twin brother.
Why not point out the hypocrisy in the posters who trashed Povetkin but are siding with Canelo? There's a ton of that here too and perhaps that's worse because they had to hear all about it then and now the tables have turned whereas the folks backing Canelo were 100% without a doubt that Povetkin was a cheating scumbag.
Both are cheats.
Comment
Comment