Thats an argument to make. Tyson might be a bad example to have brought up cuz idk if he'd have learned boxing from as quality a mind as D'Amato for his particular build/physical attributes if not for D'Amato.
I mean does Angelo Dundee make a Mike Tyson? Idk about that. Does Eddie Futch even make a Mike Tyson with his Joe Frazier history? Idk about that one either, but Futch would likely have been better than Dundee for him.
So bad example by me perhaps there. But mainly I think high level trainers are gonna take high level fighters to a high level (how high is the question cuz I assume some trainers will get you higher than others but idk that its about the quality of the trainer so much as the adaptability of the trainer + boxer) assuming there aren't personality conflicts or other sorta bs that gets into the mix that hurts the trainer/boxer relationship.
I mean does Angelo Dundee make a Mike Tyson? Idk about that. Does Eddie Futch even make a Mike Tyson with his Joe Frazier history? Idk about that one either, but Futch would likely have been better than Dundee for him.
So bad example by me perhaps there. But mainly I think high level trainers are gonna take high level fighters to a high level (how high is the question cuz I assume some trainers will get you higher than others but idk that its about the quality of the trainer so much as the adaptability of the trainer + boxer) assuming there aren't personality conflicts or other sorta bs that gets into the mix that hurts the trainer/boxer relationship.
Comment