Kafkod, let's try to discuss this reasonably. Everything is relative. We're both well aware that Anthony Joshua is one of the biggest stars in boxing, if not the biggest. We can't compare everyone else to him and say that all others are failures.
Kovalev is fighting the same night, in the same city, and they're giving away so many free tickets that it's driven the price down to $9. For a show in a very small venue.
Wilder is headlining a major NBA arena. He's the first American heavyweight in decades that can come close to filling a major NBA arena. You have to consider the conditions of the marketplace that he inherited. American heavyweight boxing was essentially dead before he came along. The previous American heavyweight champions, Briggs, Byrd, Oquendo, Brewster, etc were fighting in front of very small crowds.
So wouldn't it make more sense to praise Wilder for how much he's improved things here instead of blaming him for the poor conditions that existed before he came along?
Kovalev is fighting the same night, in the same city, and they're giving away so many free tickets that it's driven the price down to $9. For a show in a very small venue.
Wilder is headlining a major NBA arena. He's the first American heavyweight in decades that can come close to filling a major NBA arena. You have to consider the conditions of the marketplace that he inherited. American heavyweight boxing was essentially dead before he came along. The previous American heavyweight champions, Briggs, Byrd, Oquendo, Brewster, etc were fighting in front of very small crowds.
So wouldn't it make more sense to praise Wilder for how much he's improved things here instead of blaming him for the poor conditions that existed before he came along?
Comment