Comments Thread For: Mayweather vs. Ms. Jackson Legal Battle is Heading To Trial

[Tha Kid]

Your bio? Come on man, you've got nothing for women to take from you. I imagine that it's very hard to get involved with gold digging women when you're worth 300-400 million. Believe it or not some, if not most gold diggers come in disguise and act like they want you for you.

This muh****a said he would rather **** average *****es. hahahahaha!!! That's because you average dude! What dude prefers to **** average females? Hahaha

[j.razor]

An eight grader

And with a billion bucks. I think we are the ones with "An eight grade" LMAO!

[j.razor]

Floyd is dumb as a box of rocks. Do any of you really think he’s the brains behind his success?

Yes, he is part of it....You are just jealous & it must suk for you....

[FinitoxDinamita]

Floyd got shtload of money its all good. He just needs to keep a smaller entourage though.

Me, i dont let anybody into my home besides my parents. None of my wife’s friends are allowed in my home. *** that. I dont even allow the wife to use too much facebook either. No posting pictures of me or my babies, none.

[Citizen Koba]

Yes, as men we look for traits relating to reproduction - hence, why men prefer younger, fertile appearing women.

I'm not blaming women for Hypergamy, but you have to face it and adapt accordingly. The problem is that we live in a gynocentric society, so women's hypergamy is on steroids. They are falsely accusing men in an attempt to take away money and power from men and have it transferred to women.

Privilege as to rights and Hypergamy are not a good mix. Women don't have any of the responsibility of men but have all of the rights and even extra privilege on top of that.

You ain't defined what you mean by hypergamy, yet, man.

I can prove this statement incorrect - or at the best a massive and unfair generalisation - merely by giving one example a woman who doesn't conform (and I guarantee I'll be able to come up with many examples), but I kind of need a definition

All women are born with Hypergamy

... we talking just actual marriage with the goal of increasing wealth or social status here? Or any kind of relationship? What you gonna say to independently wealthy women who, say, select partners for their looks or cock size? For their creative brains or artistry?

And how did you form this opinion anyway... personal experience? How many women have you actually dated here? You really quite sure your opinion is completely triangulated? Maybe you tend to go out with a certain kind of chick, man? Most of us select partners from within a fairly narrow spectrum.

And saying it's biology? Well that opens up a whole new can of worms, but again, it really boils down to how you're defining this ****...

So. How bout it?

EDIT: Oh yeah. Just to clarify... I'm not advocating blindly trusting women - or indeed anyone else - you always need to keep your wits about you regardless of who you're dealing with, but to just assume that every woman has the same underlying motive shows a kind of ignorance and narrowness of perception that is every bit as naive.

[The Big Dunn]

It's amazing how many people want to see Floyd lose at something.

[Bwall004]

Actually a lot of those guys weren't in their prime.

Margarito in his prime? Good one.

Floyd sure didn’t want no part of him.

[Bwall004]

It's amazing how many people want to see Floyd lose at something.

It’s also equally amazing that some people will defend this man no matter what.

I mean, his fans don’t even want to see him fight the best. They would advise Floyd to stay away from Crawford or Spence. That’s what I don’t get.

[The Big Dunn]

It’s also equally amazing that some people will defend this man no matter what.

I mean, his fans don’t even want to see him fight the best. They would advise Floyd to stay away from Crawford or Spence. That’s what I don’t get.

Correcting lies in a post isn't defending him.

What kind of ****** shit is this? He did fight the best. He beat them. That is why he is a 1st ballot HOF'er and is in the top 20-25 on every objective list of great boxers.

The man is retired, why would anyone be calling on him to fight Crawford, Spence or anyone?

[Bwall004]

Correcting lies in a post isn't defending him.

What kind of ****** shit is this? He did fight the best. He beat them. That is why he is a 1st ballot HOF'er and is in the top 20-25 on every objective list of great boxers.

The man is retired, why would anyone be calling on him to fight Crawford, Spence or anyone?

He did not fight the best when they were at their best and you know it. When he became “Money” it became a business.

He just fought a man that had ZERO fights. ZERO!!! He could have fought Spence then. Oh, that doesn’t make good business sense. Lol