How is even even a debate that Lomachenko is P4P#1?
Collapse
-
-
Lomachenko is top 5 without a doubt, and probably top 3 for sure. #1 is very arguable. Anyone saying otherwise has personal bias against him. There really is no doubt about it.
The loss to Salido can't kept being looked back at. It happened almost 4 years ago, and in that time, he's already beaten much better opponents, including one Salido went to war with (and he did so incredibly easily). Walters, Rigo, Russell are definitely fantastic wins since that time. Pacquiao, Hagler, and even Hopkins all had defeats early enough in their career to non-ATG's. Certainly doesn't hurt their reputation to the point they couldn't be classified as Hall of Famer's/top P4P fighters, years after the setbacks.
If Lomachenko moves up to his 3rd weight class, and continues to do well, then I expect the same people discrediting him to continue claiming he needs to move up to 140 and fight xxxx.
I'm imagining he fights Beltran (who's certainly a live body) in May, and then hopefully gets a tough opponent like Linares (I doubt Mikey comes back down to 135?).Last edited by UNBIASED BOXING; 02-26-2018, 09:45 AM.Comment
Comment