Comments Thread For: Mike Tyson: Deontay Wilder Could Beat Me? I Don't Think So!

[juggernaut666]

Wilder is 6'7". You are talking about 6'3", 6'4" guys. Please, stop comparing apples to oranges. Further, we can respectfully disagree on who is favored over the other. I will not favor any of them over Wilder.

Now, on who forgot what - Wilder has a great jab. How come you missed that out? He fights well on the back foot. Did you forget that too? Does he get wild and careless sometimes? Yes, he does. Does he have weaknesses? Yes, he does.

I do not see any of the big men who can beat Wilder. You do - you have no evidence to show that. Neither do I. My assessment and inference are based on how Wilder has dealt with everyone so far. He has not lost. He has beat all the 6'3", 6'4", 6'5" guys easily. Now, those are facts.

"He has beat all the 6'3", 6'4", 6'5" guys easily. Now, those are facts. "

[vitali1999]

and i think wilder beats the truth, ruddock, bruno, berbick, thomas, smith, green, briggs, tucker.....

Wilder couldn't beat Prince Charles Martin, he can't clean out his own era let alone somebody else's

[Ray Corso]

"whooped by a 42-1 underdog BUM"' ref to Buster Douglas.


Study sonny, Buster had more than a few "bum fights" but Tyson wasn't one of them. Obviously you don't know that Buster Douglas was a well schooled fighter wit a very good background. He got off the deck from Tyson and fought his azz off and stopped Mike.

Wilder has fought no one any where near the talent and skill level of Buster Douglas. Busters short comings are well documented it's no excuse it's just facts.

Study before you yak in this section, their are folks here who know some truths.

Ray

[eco1]

"whooped by a 42-1 underdog BUM"' ref to Buster Douglas.


Study sonny, Buster had more than a few "bum fights" but Tyson wasn't one of them. Obviously you don't know that Buster Douglas was a well schooled fighter wit a very good background. He got off the deck from Tyson and fought his azz off and stopped Mike.

Wilder has fought no one any where near the talent and skill level of Buster Douglas. Busters short comings are well documented it's no excuse it's just facts.

Study before you yak in this section, their are folks here who know some truths.

Ray

And something else and I agree with Ray 100%
The Douglas that fought Tyson that night would have beaten any top contender, just for that night.

[GhostofDempsey]

This is what Wilder vs. prime Tyson would look like.

E

[Elroy The Great]

Wilder couldn't beat Prince Charles Martin, he can't clean out his own era let alone somebody else's

so why is that 0 still in tact ????

his era is still ongoing, if you havent noticed.

mike tyson only cleaned out the bums of his era, yet hes loved by almost everyone.

[eco1]

This is what Wilder vs. prime Tyson would look like.

E

The difference Is Wilder cannot take those punches.

[zerosixthree]

I don't doubt that Wilder can beat Tyson. He's got enough skill and a size advantage to do so. The only thing I doubt is his heart and his brain. That's what it will come down to in the end.

I think the first minute of the first round would tell you how this fight would go. Wilder would need to do to Tyson what Klitschko did to Povetkin. Keep him on the outside and tie him up and use his size and strength advantage to tire him out if he gets too close. If he can keep that up he can eke out an easy points victory or even a late stoppage. However, if he lets Tyson get to him and loses his discipline, either by shelling up in fear, or tries to show his bravery by trading with Tyson I don't think he'll see the final bell.

Tyson can be beat. He's not invincible. He's shown several times that by keeping a cool head and sticking to a plan he can be outboxed. The question is whether or not Wilder has the discipline and the smarts to do so and as of yet I don't think that's really been put to the test.

[vitali1999]

so why is that 0 still in tact ????

his era is still ongoing, if you havent noticed.

mike tyson only cleaned out the bums of his era, yet hes loved by almost everyone.

He's still has the 0 cause all he's ever fought is unranked bums. Stevirne really doesn't count. Tyson fought ranked contenders and all belt holders. Your boy still has one belt, that's why he's still undefeated

[vitali1999]

Wilder is 6'7". You are talking about 6'3", 6'4" guys. Please, stop comparing apples to oranges. Further, we can respectfully disagree on who is favored over the other. I will not favor any of them over Wilder.

Now, on who forgot what - Wilder has a great jab. How come you missed that out? He fights well on the back foot. Did you forget that too? Does he get wild and careless sometimes? Yes, he does. Does he have weaknesses? Yes, he does.

I do not see any of the big men who can beat Wilder. You do - you have no evidence to show that. Neither do I. My assessment and inference are based on how Wilder has dealt with everyone so far. He has not lost. He has beat all the 6'3", 6'4", 6'5" guys easily. Now, those are facts.

You are so full of **** you can probably be smelled a mile away