Is Groves’ resurgence a boost to Froch’s legacy?

Collapse
Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Eff Pandas
    Banned
    Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
    • Apr 2012
    • 52129
    • 3,624
    • 2,147
    • 1,635,919

    #11
    Definitely. Anytime some guy you beat does some bigger things post-the L to you it always bumps you up a lil bit at a minimum.

    Thats why Floyd's impact on boxing doesn't really settle into place for the next generation til we see how far Canelo goes in the game & to a lesser degree those still around who could potentially do something in the future.

    Comment

    • jas
      Voice of Reason
      Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
      • Jul 2005
      • 22542
      • 937
      • 914
      • 1,059,614

      #12
      Hes declined since froch

      Hes jus fought the easier guys at 168 and lost to the better guys like jack. Eubank wasnt even a 168 until recently

      Comment

      • dan_cov
        Zombie Taylor
        Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
        • Jun 2011
        • 24873
        • 3,322
        • 3,339
        • 145,001

        #13
        Originally posted by jas
        Hes declined since froch

        Hes jus fought the easier guys at 168 and lost to the better guys like jack. Eubank wasnt even a 168 until recently

        This, spot on.
        Groves is just in the right place at the right time for now at least with Jack going to lhw.

        Comment

        • dan_cov
          Zombie Taylor
          Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
          • Jun 2011
          • 24873
          • 3,322
          • 3,339
          • 145,001

          #14
          With Kessler, Ward, Froch moving on\retiring the division is awful, the new era didn't come close to filling the void they left behind the one decent fighter that emerged was Jack who cleaned up and moved on leaving the duds to battle it out.

          Groves has never been the best even in any era. If he goes on and beats Smith and say Zurdo then it changes but frankly I feel he losses to both as he always has when he's fought a truly top SMW and not a hyped up MW.

          He's a good fighter still but that's where it ends. BJS beat Eubank too at his best weight nobody hypes that win why is it so great Groves won? People are going on like its some great career defining win that boosts everyones legacy or something, I think its people trying to justify the hype tbh.
          Guy was the U.K Jeff Lacy equivalent.
          Last edited by dan_cov; 02-23-2018, 04:00 PM.

          Comment

          • Madison Boxing
            Banned
            Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
            • Jul 2015
            • 35364
            • 6,455
            • 3,367
            • 190,590

            #15
            yeah it does and dont forget not only did froch beat him, he planted his feet, threw the right hand and knocked him out in front of 80000 people at wembley.

            Comment

            • BOLLOCKS
              Banned
              Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
              • Apr 2006
              • 36266
              • 1,401
              • 1,537
              • 58,925

              #16
              Yes, Froch is the truth.

              Comment

              • sunny31
                Undisputed Champion
                Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
                • Feb 2006
                • 5780
                • 450
                • 35
                • 128,703

                #17
                To be honest I knew Groves would come back and do well, the only question was whether he was damaged goods. His loss to Jack was a close fight and if you look at his 3 losses they came against two of the most underrated fighters in recent years. Froch is the 2nd best 168lber of his generation and the guy that was above him was special.

                Groves is starting to put together a nice little resume lets see how far he gets.

                Comment

                • Geralt69
                  Banned
                  Silver Champion - 100-500 posts
                  • Feb 2018
                  • 278
                  • 25
                  • 21
                  • 687

                  #18
                  Originally posted by BOLLOCKS
                  Yes, Froch is the truth.
                  Froch was more of a gatekeeper...
                  Lots of home cookin...

                  Calzaghe would have stopped him.

                  In fact I believe Froch wouldn't even get past a prime Lacy...

                  Comment

                  Working...
                  TOP