Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Comments Thread For: Hearn: Jacobs Deserves Shot at the Winner of Canelo-Golovkin

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #21
    Originally posted by Bronx2245 View Post
    Don't forget Ryota Murata, the WBA "regular" Champion. The problem is Murata is on ESPN, Charlo and Derevyanchenko are PBC/SHO, so Jacobs' only hope is to fight GGG/Canelo in a voluntary fight! He could fight Andrade, but they're good friends!
    He can fight anyone on PBC. PBC fighters (other than Jacobs and a few others) have exclusive HBO contracts. Charlo can fight on HBO just like Jacobs did even before his Hearn deal and a few others like Khan, ect. His opponent Sulecki is a PBC fighter.

    Comment


    • #22
      Jacobs does deserve the next shot but it's guaranteed that saunders will be the one to get the shot. He hasn't been milking that title for no reason. It's almost cash out time.

      Comment


      • #23
        Originally posted by suffolkbull3 View Post
        i understand where ur coming from, but being ggg and canelo are hbo, dont be surprised if the winner fights danny next. i know they will be going after the winner very hard and being danny is also under hbo with not a single big fight yet, i think hbo will go out if their way to get the fight made. thats just my opinion, has nothing to do with anything my friend *wink* has said to me.
        Loeffler has already been speaking to Warren about fighting Saunders if he gets passed Canelo.

        Comment


        • #24
          I don't think either one will be eager to get in the ring with Jacobs. Golovkin knew he got a gift from the judges so he is no rush for a rematch. Canelo would probably fight Jacobs but I think he will be looking for super fights from now on.

          Comment


          • #25
            Lol more b.s. it's time for Danny to move up.

            We're looking at a trilogy here, with BJS after. That leaves Danny getting a shot at the earliest in September 2019.

            Why play dumb? Just go to 168 and make noise.

            Comment


            • #26
              If gg wins he needs to fight his mandatory

              Comment


              • #27
                Originally posted by HarvardBlue View Post
                I don't think either one will be eager to get in the ring with Jacobs. Golovkin knew he got a gift from the judges so he is no rush for a rematch. Canelo would probably fight Jacobs but I think he will be looking for super fights from now on.
                You forgot to add "In my opinion."

                Comment


                • #28
                  There are a lot of 'deserving' fighters for the winner of Golovkin/Canelo, and not surprisingly. It will be well paid fight for a unified, lineal title. Literally everyone's dream.

                  No matter who the winner fights, there will be a ton of backlash from others. A lot of fanboys who hate either Canelo or Golovkin (or both), will brainlessly claim that they's ducking someone. Some feel that Jacobs deserves a rematch. Others feel that Charlo is the new bogeyman. I personally think that Derevyanchenko is the most dangerous out of them all. There is no wrong choice and there is no right choice.

                  At some point in time, all of these guys - Andrade, Charlo, Derevyanchenko, Jacobs, Saunders, Murata need to come up with plans B and C if they are not picked. I think if the list can get trimmed a little bit, they'll be able to make a better case for being deserving of a shot. Think of it as a mini tournament. Andrade-Derev was discussed as was Saunders-Jacobs. If Saunders beats Jacobs, he becomes the clear #1 IMO.

                  Comment


                  • #29
                    Originally posted by RJJ-94-02=GOAT View Post
                    ������Beating Arias and Sulecki don’t earn you title shots, never mind the winner of a super fight.
                    **** Eddie Hearn, he’s just full of ****.
                    Not only that, his performance against Arias was boring as shyt

                    Comment


                    • #30
                      Originally posted by turnedup View Post
                      You forgot to add "In my opinion."
                      Lol. You're right. Although I'm not one to claim anything I say on this site is absolute fact like some others do.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X
                      TOP