P4P #1: Terence Crawford or Vasyl Lomachenko?

Collapse
Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • VG_Addict
    king meat's twin
    Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
    • Jun 2012
    • 5618
    • 237
    • 3
    • 53,380

    #1

    P4P #1: Terence Crawford or Vasyl Lomachenko?

    Who would you say more deserves the title of P4P #1? On one hand, Crawford is the more complete fighter. On the other, Loma's wins over Russell and Rigo are arguably better than anyone Crawford has fought.
  • Morrie ATG
    Banned
    • Feb 2018
    • 679
    • 26
    • 48
    • 1,163

    #2
    Lomachenko. My boy should’ve signed up with Haymon too. I had a dream that Haymon adopted Loma as a son and sent him to Harvard, to teach how to be a multi-millionaire in Business.

    Comment

    • Randall Cunning
      Undisputed Champion
      Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
      • Oct 2015
      • 6041
      • 163
      • 30
      • 84,599

      #3
      There was a thread a couple of days ago. "If they were the same weight who would win" or something along those lines, with a poll. Poll was pretty much unanimous Lomachenko.

      Comment

      • RussB23
        Loma Crew
        Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
        • Jul 2015
        • 4329
        • 154
        • 66
        • 12,195

        #4
        Lomachenko, big fan of crawford too though but lomachenko is better. Only racially bias fans will say crawford is beter.

        Comment

        • Bjl12
          Banned
          • Sep 2016
          • 4952
          • 185
          • 28
          • 59,933

          #5
          Either or for me

          Comment

          • Madison Boxing
            Banned
            Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
            • Jul 2015
            • 35364
            • 6,455
            • 3,367
            • 190,590

            #6
            Russell, rigo and Walters are all better wins than any of Crawford's. I don't see how there's any case for him being above Loma, I really don't.

            Comment

            • Madison Boxing
              Banned
              Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
              • Jul 2015
              • 35364
              • 6,455
              • 3,367
              • 190,590

              #7
              Originally posted by Loma#1
              Lomachenko. My boy should’ve signed up with Haymon too. I had a dream that Haymon adopted Loma as a son and sent him to Harvard, to teach how to be a multi-millionaire in Business.
              He'd be fighting hot dog sellers once a year if he was fighting with haymon at this stage in his career.

              Comment

              • chrisJS
                Undisputed Champion
                Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
                • Mar 2007
                • 8989
                • 331
                • 64
                • 78,477

                #8
                Originally posted by RussB23
                Lomachenko, big fan of crawford too though but lomachenko is better. Only racially bias fans will say crawford is beter.
                Not necessarily. Crawford is an incredible fighter and just as complete as Lomachenko and probably the more impressive offensive fighter whereas Loma is the more impressive physical talent and defensive fighter.

                Both are great but I think Loma has a higher ceiling and is improving even more (Crawford gets better every fight too). Loma has the better wins too.

                I'd pick Loma but Crawford is an acceptable answer.

                Comment

                • Raggamuffin
                  Undisputed Champion
                  Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
                  • Aug 2016
                  • 8210
                  • 457
                  • 966
                  • 43,263

                  #9
                  Crawford. Loma has lost. I don't know if Loma can handle a come forward fighter. I needed to see the Salido rematch. Maybe if Loma fights Berchelt or Garcia we can get a better gauge. Bud is a two time lineal champion in 2 divisions and going for a third.

                  Comment

                  • Illmatic94
                    Undisputed Champion
                    • Oct 2015
                    • 3955
                    • 235
                    • 14
                    • 32,550

                    #10
                    Originally posted by RussB23
                    Lomachenko, big fan of crawford too though but lomachenko is better. Only racially bias fans will say crawford is beter.
                    Really? so somebody can't believe Crawford is better without being racially biased? Loma himself says Crawford is P4P #1. Is he racially biased? and I doubt he's the type to just say that to play nice because he said in an interview that Mikey Garcia will be easy for him. so he doesn't come across as the type to just say things to appear humble. both Loma and Crawford have strong cases for the #1 spot. IMO Canelo is #1. but all this P4P **** is all subjective anyway but to brush off other people as racially bias if they dont agree with you is nonsense.

                    Comment

                    Working...
                    TOP