-
Last edited by kushking; 02-17-2018, 11:20 AM. -
Hes like two RTARDS had a baby and dropped the baby on its head multiple times while giving it lead paint chips to suk on...You & your 20 page responses would be laughable if they didn't demonstrate that your that mentally ******ed,no wonder the only dksab' who take you seriously on here are your fellow gggimp/lomasexuals/kkkovaquit apologists,keep convincing yourself that theres a conspiracy against white fighters by the white media who ironically is responsible 4 hyping overrated great white hopes like ggg/kkkov/lomo...
:wt:Comment
-
That idiot says Mikey weighs 170lbs??? SMHComment
-
Holy sht!!!!
Lomachenko vs. Some Homeless BUM
Pac vs. ALvarado???
Yup this card is hot pile of DOG SHT!!! I wont even waste my time watching this dog sht!
Ill he watching Ali and hopefully Linares on HBO instead. As well as the replaying of Canelo BEATING GGG!!!! That will never get old. And then I can laugh at some more of his fans afterwards.Comment
-
GGG is Ring Magazine's #1 P4P boxer right now. Before him and briefly Chocolatito, they had black boxers in that spot for the majority of the last few DECADES, and their editor is a black man, so remind me again how that is "white media" or media that is biased towards whites? But GGG is their #1. Lomachenko, on the other hand, is ESPN's #1 boxer in the world right now. And they, likewise, have a history of ranking black boxers high.You & your 20 page responses would be laughable if they didn't demonstrate that your that mentally ******ed,no wonder the only dksab' who take you seriously on here are your fellow gggimp/lomasexuals/kkkovaquit apologists,keep convincing yourself that theres a conspiracy against white fighters by the white media who ironically is responsible 4 hyping overrated great white hopes like ggg/kkkov/lomo...:wt:
So when you are calling two boxers ranked #1 P4P in the world "overrated," maybe that makes you the racially obsessed biased confused fanboy, or in this case hater, not me. Not that they are always right, because usually they skew to the top financial draws in the sport, but that just shows how great GGG and Lomachenko are that they've been able to fight their ways to the top spot despite not being the #1 financial draw in the sport.
Lastly, I'd like everyone to please note for the record that kushking has repeatedly proven himself incapable of arguing any of my points, or addressing how I disproved all his dumb points at all, so instead all he does is complain that my post is too long. Yeah, I wouldn't like stumbling onto multiple paragraphs containing example after example after example proving I'm an idiot, either. Pro tip KushKing, if you are sick of seeing multi-paragraph posts correcting all the ****** things you say, then try not saying so many ****** things! Not that complicated!Comment
-
Comment
-
I just don't understand how they are this ******. They make it too easy. Never seen people this immune to facts. They spew sentence after sentence of ******ity, but then when you point it out, they just complain that you took too long so they didn't read it, which is an excuse that I guess allows them to maintain their false reality. It's pathetic. If they truly believe they're right, then they shouldn't be afraid to defend their positions. But maybe deep down, even they know they're wrong. But, you'd never guess it, because they just keep on spewing the same garbage.Comment
-
Not me, dumbass. Mikey Garcia said it himself to Ellie Sechbak.
I mean, wow. You just keep lowering the bar more with every comment. Quit while you're... uhh... ahead...... bro....... ahem....
Rigo was offered the Loma fight while Loma was still at 126. Rigo refused, not Loma. That's the difference and it's been explained many times. Rigo was also offered more money than Loma made to fight GRJ, but still declined, so money is no excuse either. It was enough money for Loma to fight top opposition in only his 3rd pro fight, it should have been enough for Rigo to. It was also over twice as much as Loma made to fight Salido. Loma fought an 11 pound bigger opponent for 250k or less, but Rigo couldn't move up 4 pounds for over 500k. That's not Loma's fault.
As for Marriaga, that was supposed to be Salido, but Salido also declined to fight Loma. Once again, not under Loma's control.
So no, just because you're so ******, you can't understand simple differences from one situation to another, does not make me a hypocrite because I can. If the Loma-Rigo and Loma-Salido situations were the same, but I treated them differently, then I would be a hypocrite, but since they're different situations, having different opinions about them does not make me a hypocrite. Another big difference is that Loma made weight vs Rigo, and also made weight the next day as part of a rehydration clause. Salido on the other hand missed weight the day before the Loma fight by 2 pounds, then rehydrated another 18 or 19 pounds. Loma made weight then rehydrated far less than that.
I have to say, this pattern of you spewing lies, me correcting you, then you refusing to read the corrections, and giving false reasoning to justify you DUCKING the truth, is getting old and boring. You're clearly not motivated by boxing OR logic, but, most likely, by race. Then you try to cover that up by saying I'm the one that's racially focused. If you read my posts, you'd see that my points are focused on facts, logic, and being consistent, not on race. Your posts lack those qualities, so it's understandable all you have left to lean on is race, but that doesn't make it cool, and it definitely doesn't make your posts make sense.Comment
Tweet
..
Comment