How would a phone Tommy Hearns do against a guy like Jermell Charlo
Collapse
-
-
im sick to death of hearing about these two muppets. better than hearns smh, they couldnt carry hearns jockstrap. These kids werent even getting hype until they beat two chinless hypejobs (williams and lubin) actually i say hypejobs, the only ones hyping them were the yanks. Noone was on the bandwagon until then, cause he looked like dog****e against trout. And now jermells sudenly getting hype, it wasnt long ago that everyone forgot about him saying hes the lesser charlo, then he lands a half decent shot on lubins 6 year old girl chin and now hes a certified killer. what happened to the days that a fighter actually had to beat someone good before the proclamations of greatness start?Both are clearly talented fighters with solid futures. I don't see greatness though but I think both can make their mark. I agree on the resumes though. Far more accomplished and talented fighters with far better resumes have been *****ted on by the same folks claiming these guys are the second coming.
Hearns iced a still excellent Duran and outpointed the extremely great Benitez at 154. Conventional wisdom says he's having it his way with either Charlo.Comment
-
And Hearns not a weight bully?
Homie was 6'1 with a 78 inch reach fighting as a welterweight. Jermell is a 5'11 jr middleweight and will kove up in about a year.Comment
-
-
Tommy ended up moving all the way up to Cruiserweight if memory serves me right, and the only times I can think of him being KO;d were from Hagler (Incredible fight and Hagler KO'd everyone) and Barkley. Plus he was KO'd once by Sugar Ray at Welterweight (no shame in that one either, especially in the 14th round)The hard part about judging Tommy in mythical fights above 147 is his chin. He is a FAR superior fighter to Charlo IMO but if Charlo lands on Tommy's chin its very likely Tommy doesn't recover.
I will pick Tommy by KO because I respect his talent and skill over someone relatively untested like Charlo.
I think that's all of Tommy's KO losses, actually.Comment
-

Looks like a legit welterweight to me. It's not like he would put on 20lbs between the weigh in and match like Arturo Gatti did.Comment
-
I get a lot of what you are saying. There is a ton of hypocrisy. The same folks who are adamant anything out of Europe is a product of nothing but hype but these guys and Spence (who's also largely unproven and not without weaknesses) are the truth and the real deal. Some folks just can't assess qualities and merits without a biased motive or an emotional agenda. I think it goes the other way to a degree but obviously nowhere near as extreme as the pro-US anti-euro agenda that's spewed on here and social media. A lot of them have to try and push and convince people that only black is good and european or white is awful and some people get on board. There isn't an aggressive agenda the other way outside of a few trolls so I think guys like Charlo's, Spence get more of a pass because their moves and careers aren't unfairly or overly scrutinized and measured to double standards. I've always just judged things equally on on their own individual merits and enjoy fighters of all backgrounds.im sick to death of hearing about these two muppets. better than hearns smh, they couldnt carry hearns jockstrap. These kids werent even getting hype until they beat two chinless hypejobs (williams and lubin) actually i say hypejobs, the only ones hyping them were the yanks. Noone was on the bandwagon until then, cause he looked like dog****e against trout. And now jermells sudenly getting hype, it wasnt long ago that everyone forgot about him saying hes the lesser charlo, then he lands a half decent shot on lubins 6 year old girl chin and now hes a certified killer. what happened to the days that a fighter actually had to beat someone good before the proclamations of greatness start?
I do believe they are fine fighters and like I said will be around for a while as major players but neither has even been the top dog in his division yet let alone beat all-time greats in their peaks.Comment
-
Somehow in CJS world, on a site that is overwhelmingly non black, he sees more of a "pro-US anti-euro agenda that's spewed on here" than the other way and feels, "A lot of them have to try and push and convince people that only black is good and european or white is awful and some people get on board. There isn't an aggressive agenda the other way..."I get a lot of what you are saying. There is a ton of hypocrisy. The same folks who are adamant anything out of Europe is a product of nothing but hype but these guys and Spence (who's also largely unproven and not without weaknesses) are the truth and the real deal. Some folks just can't assess qualities and merits without a biased motive or an emotional agenda. I think it goes the other way to a degree but obviously nowhere near as extreme as the pro-US anti-euro agenda that's spewed on here and social media. A lot of them have to try and push and convince people that only black is good and european or white is awful and some people get on board. There isn't an aggressive agenda the other way outside of a few trolls so I think guys like Charlo's, Spence get more of a pass because their moves and careers aren't unfairly or overly scrutinized and measured to double standards. I've always just judged things equally on on their own individual merits and enjoy fighters of all backgrounds.
I do believe they are fine fighters and like I said will be around for a while as major players but neither has even been the top dog in his division yet let alone beat all-time greats in their peaks.
How is that possible on NSB with what we know about the demographics of posters?Comment
-
great post, green k sent.I get a lot of what you are saying. There is a ton of hypocrisy. The same folks who are adamant anything out of Europe is a product of nothing but hype but these guys and Spence (who's also largely unproven and not without weaknesses) are the truth and the real deal. Some folks just can't assess qualities and merits without a biased motive or an emotional agenda. I think it goes the other way to a degree but obviously nowhere near as extreme as the pro-US anti-euro agenda that's spewed on here and social media. A lot of them have to try and push and convince people that only black is good and european or white is awful and some people get on board. There isn't an aggressive agenda the other way outside of a few trolls so I think guys like Charlo's, Spence get more of a pass because their moves and careers aren't unfairly or overly scrutinized and measured to double standards. I've always just judged things equally on on their own individual merits and enjoy fighters of all backgrounds.
I do believe they are fine fighters and like I said will be around for a while as major players but neither has even been the top dog in his division yet let alone beat all-time greats in their peaks.Comment
Comment