Unify, face Charlo, Jacobs rematch, beat up the other Charlo for bonus points, then retire.
If GGG beats Canelo, should he face BJS or Charlo next?
Collapse
-
Oh man, walk around LHW Bummelo is sooooo huge....sweaters doe, and camera proximity, oh noes!!!



Last edited by Morrie ATG; 02-13-2018, 01:21 PM.Comment
-
This one is a grey area.
If you look at it from GGG's perspective, he's been claiming he wanted to be the undisputed champ all along so fighting Saunders who has the last belt makes sense.
But then again, from that same perspective, it could be seen as hypocritical to not fight his mandatory after he used the same 'mandatory stance' to justify why Canelo was supposed to fight him (when Canelo was wbc champ).
From Charlo's perspective, it's totally unfair if GGG gets to fight Saunders without first defending against him. The wbc already took away his chance by ordering Canelo vs GGG 2 (even though Canelo is not even in their rankings and made it clear he don't give a damn about them), and then they forced him to fight another meaningless eliminator to keep his mandatory position. So then allow GGG to fight someone else after Canelo without first defending against him would be totally unfair to him.Comment
-
-
Comment
-
Saunders. Golovkin is at the stage where he needs big fights against the best opponents whereas Charlo is more of a stay busy/tune up type of opponent cause let's face it the kids done nothing. Lara and Hurd looked way more impressive then Charlo against trout.Comment
-
Comment