Scoring fights: GGG's style makes his work underestimated

Collapse
Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • BillyBoxing
    Undisputed Champion
    Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
    • Apr 2009
    • 7454
    • 488
    • 62
    • 50,228

    #1

    Scoring fights: GGG's style makes his work underestimated

    I'm thinking about the Nelo fight (draw heavily contested) and the Jacobs fight (a lot of people disagreed with the GGG UD win).

    I thought GGG dominated both fights, technically and mentally.


    I think GGG's problem is he's not an "eye catching punches" fighter and his defense is mainly about blocking punches. That's what made his dominance over Canelo and Jacobs not clear to a lot of people.

    -Despite Nelo landing the best "highlights" punches in the fight, GGG overall did more damage, outlanded his opponent IMHO.

    -I think he clearly beat Jacobs.
    Jacobs didn't land a lot of significant punches if you ask me.I disagree with people saying Jacobs did better than Nelo.

    Nelo put more damage on GGG than Danny did, and Nelo's defense was on point (didn't got dropped).

    Yet the decision is being contested by many fans. I think once again, people are giving too much credit to flashy fighters.
    Jacobs landed punches mainly on GGG's arms and gloves while GGG methodically beat him down with his Jab and middle range work.
  • SplitSecond
    Undisputed Champion
    Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
    • Nov 2009
    • 23151
    • 1,715
    • 1,187
    • 85,044

    #2
    What's funny to me is people looking at the first few rounds and thinking Golovkin was actually being outboxed or Canelo shut him down/nullified him. Evident by the moron Kellerman and a lot of no-nothing fanboys on here. Mayweather can take the first 3 rounds to analyze but Golovkin as a pressure fighter is meant to jump on a guy from the opening bell risking getting caught cold, genius I tell you.

    Comment

    • Morrie ATG
      Banned
      • Feb 2018
      • 679
      • 26
      • 48
      • 1,163

      #3
      Originally posted by BillyBoxing
      I'm thinking about the Nelo fight (draw heavily contested) and the Jacobs fight (a lot of people disagreed with the GGG UD win).

      I thought GGG dominated both fights, technically and mentally.


      I think GGG's problem is he's not an "eye catching punches" fighter and his defense is mainly about blocking punches. That's what made his dominance over Canelo and Jacobs not clear to a lot of people.

      -Despite Nelo landing the best "highlights" punches in the fight, GGG overall did more damage, outlanded his opponent IMHO.

      -I think he clearly beat Jacobs.
      Jacobs didn't land a lot of significant punches if you ask me.I disagree with people saying Jacobs did better than Nelo.

      Nelo put more damage on GGG than Danny did, and Nelo's defense was on point (didn't got dropped).

      Yet the decision is being contested by many fans. I think once again, people are giving too much credit to flashy fighters.
      Jacobs landed punches mainly on GGG's arms and gloves while GGG methodically beat him down with his Jab and middle range work.
      So if GGG landed 40 more punches than Bummelo the whole fight:

      40 ÷ 12 = 3 punches more per round

      Therefore, let’s say 2 jabs to 1 power shot per round that Triple had over Bummelo.

      So that fact alone, 2 to 1 jabs and power shots in favor to Triple Gee is why he had a dominant performance over Bummelo?

      Boxing fans need to revise how to analyze fights. Oh no wait Bummelo “ran”

      Triple Gee’s ratio didn’t beat Bummelo’s power shots

      Comment

      • Boxing Goat
        The G.O.A.T.
        Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
        • Aug 2013
        • 13150
        • 557
        • 1,027
        • 128,865

        #4
        Originally posted by BillyBoxing
        I'm thinking about the Nelo fight (draw heavily contested) and the Jacobs fight (a lot of people disagreed with the GGG UD win).

        I thought GGG dominated both fights, technically and mentally.


        I think GGG's problem is he's not an "eye catching punches" fighter and his defense is mainly about blocking punches. That's what made his dominance over Canelo and Jacobs not clear to a lot of people.

        -Despite Nelo landing the best "highlights" punches in the fight, GGG overall did more damage, outlanded his opponent IMHO.

        -I think he clearly beat Jacobs.
        Jacobs didn't land a lot of significant punches if you ask me.I disagree with people saying Jacobs did better than Nelo.

        Nelo put more damage on GGG than Danny did, and Nelo's defense was on point (didn't got dropped).

        Yet the decision is being contested by many fans. I think once again, people are giving too much credit to flashy fighters.
        Jacobs landed punches mainly on GGG's arms and gloves while GGG methodically beat him down with his Jab and middle range work.
        In my opinion GGG easily won both fights and how people can question it is beyond me. You either land and do damage or you don't. Neither man fazed GGG at all, while he managed to KD or back up both of them. You just got to know what you're watching. Not only that, but he out landed both men per compubox so......

        Comment

        • BillyBoxing
          Undisputed Champion
          Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
          • Apr 2009
          • 7454
          • 488
          • 62
          • 50,228

          #5
          Originally posted by Loma#1
          So if GGG landed 40 more punches than Bummelo the whole fight:

          40 ÷ 12 = 3 punches more per round

          Therefore, let’s say 2 jabs to 1 power shot per round that Triple had over Bummelo.

          So that fact alone, 2 to 1 jabs and power shots in favor to Triple Gee is why he had a dominant performance over Bummelo?

          Boxing fans need to revise how to analyze fights. Oh no wait Bummelo “ran”

          Triple Gee’s ratio didn’t beat Bummelo’s power shots
          I'm not talking about compubox, but what I saw overall.

          Nelo was cute and clean but GGG beat his A$$ in 7/8 rounds if you ask me.

          Comment

          • BillyBoxing
            Undisputed Champion
            Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
            • Apr 2009
            • 7454
            • 488
            • 62
            • 50,228

            #6
            Originally posted by SplitSecond
            What's funny to me is people looking at the first few rounds and thinking Golovkin was actually being outboxed or Canelo shut him down/nullified him. Evident by the moron Kellerman and a lot of no-nothing fanboys on here. Mayweather can take the first 3 rounds to analyze but Golovkin as a pressure fighter is meant to jump on a guy from the opening bell risking getting caught cold, genius I tell you.
            the thing is GGG is the one who figured out the other fighter if you ask me.

            He lost three rounds then beat Ginger's a$$.

            Ginger will have GGG on his a$$ from the opening bell next time, lol, he better be in beast mode and fix those stamina issues.

            Comment

            • Morrie ATG
              Banned
              • Feb 2018
              • 679
              • 26
              • 48
              • 1,163

              #7
              Originally posted by BillyBoxing
              I'm not talking about compubox, but what I saw overall.

              Nelo was cute and clean but GGG beat his A$$ in 7/8 rounds if you ask me.
              But everything revolves around compubox. That’s the whole premise as to why Triple Gee fans claim he beat Bummelo. The only other angle is that Bummelo ran. It’s either one or those two things to Triple Gee fans.

              Therefore, 40 more punches over Bummelo isn’t a “dominant” win. Like I said, 3 punches more per round to Triple Gee. So which infamous punches were these? Jabs?

              Whatever reason, Bummelo can easily match Triple Gees ratio.

              Notice nobody ever dissected Triple Gee’s 40 more punches in detail. Why?!

              The DRAW was fair. People should focus on what both fighters will do differently

              Comment

              • stealthradon
                Undisputed Champion
                Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
                • Aug 2017
                • 3283
                • 108
                • 2
                • 30,404

                #8
                Originally posted by Loma#1
                But everything revolves around compubox. That’s the whole premise as to why Triple Gee fans claim he beat Bummelo. The only other angle is that Bummelo ran. It’s either one or those two things to Triple Gee fans.

                Therefore, 40 more punches over Bummelo isn’t a “dominant” win. Like I said, 3 punches more per round to Triple Gee. So which infamous punches were these? Jabs?

                Whatever reason, Bummelo can easily match Triple Gees ratio.

                Notice nobody ever dissected Triple Gee’s 40 more punches in detail. Why?!

                The DRAW was fair. People should focus on what both fighters will do differently
                The actual stats are around 191 to 92 for GGG.

                Comment

                • DuckAdonis
                  Undisputed Champion
                  Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
                  • Jul 2017
                  • 7775
                  • 197
                  • 84
                  • 188,446

                  #9
                  True, People buy more into the explosiveness and Athleticism of fighters than the actual technical skill of boxing.

                  Borat aint one of the best amateurs for nothing

                  Comment

                  • Graz
                    Undisputed Champion
                    Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
                    • May 2016
                    • 2086
                    • 51
                    • 6
                    • 10,052

                    #10
                    Originally posted by BillyBoxing
                    I'm thinking about the Nelo fight (draw heavily contested) and the Jacobs fight (a lot of people disagreed with the GGG UD win).

                    I thought GGG dominated both fights, technically and mentally.


                    I think GGG's problem is he's not an "eye catching punches" fighter and his defense is mainly about blocking punches. That's what made his dominance over Canelo and Jacobs not clear to a lot of people.

                    -Despite Nelo landing the best "highlights" punches in the fight, GGG overall did more damage, outlanded his opponent IMHO.

                    -I think he clearly beat Jacobs.
                    Jacobs didn't land a lot of significant punches if you ask me.I disagree with people saying Jacobs did better than Nelo.

                    Nelo put more damage on GGG than Danny did, and Nelo's defense was on point (didn't got dropped).

                    Yet the decision is being contested by many fans. I think once again, people are giving too much credit to flashy fighters.
                    Jacobs landed punches mainly on GGG's arms and gloves while GGG methodically beat him down with his Jab and middle range work.
                    Excellent observation and post!

                    Comment

                    Working...
                    TOP