Can you imagine what Pavlik would do to Canelo?

Collapse
Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Chuckguy
    Undisputed Champion
    Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
    • Jun 2008
    • 13927
    • 345
    • 183
    • 58,389

    #71
    Originally posted by BoxingIsGreat
    Officially it was a draw. I can see an argument either way. I liked Canelo's style better.
    I’d pick canelo over pavlik too just curios but thanks for answering

    Comment

    • SUBZER0ED
      Be water, my friend.
      Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
      • Feb 2013
      • 11341
      • 2,531
      • 1,953
      • 34,667

      #72
      Originally posted by allanperlee
      Dude, he defeated Jermaine Taylor twice, and Taylor was a beast when he was taken down.
      Yes, but Taylor was one who could dish it only. His chin was junk, and once Pavlik tested it, he was never the same.

      Comment

      • SUBZER0ED
        Be water, my friend.
        Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
        • Feb 2013
        • 11341
        • 2,531
        • 1,953
        • 34,667

        #73
        Pavlik lacked finesse and caved when faced with it. Old man Hopkins schooled him and ruined his career. There's no way a 43 year old should be able to beat a 26 year old champion. Canelo would have worked Pavlik over.

        Comment

        • 'b'
          Delete account. TALMUD
          Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
          • Nov 2017
          • 7105
          • 400
          • 481
          • 41,914

          #74
          Light him up like a....

          No, he'd put Canelo out like a candle

          Comment

          • A-Wolf
            This One Can See
            Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
            • Nov 2011
            • 6759
            • 265
            • 337
            • 61,371

            #75
            This thread..

            Why do I get the sneaking su****ion that 99% of the people picking Canelo have not seen anything more than a few Youtube highlights of Pavlik? WHY IS THAT SO OBVIOUS?

            Comment

            • GoldenGloveLove
              Undisputed Champion
              Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
              • Jul 2013
              • 2105
              • 98
              • 69
              • 10,496

              #76
              Murder him early? More like have trouble landing any flush punches on him over twelve rounds, I think.

              Comment

              • A-Wolf
                This One Can See
                Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
                • Nov 2011
                • 6759
                • 265
                • 337
                • 61,371

                #77
                Originally posted by SUBZER0ED
                Pavlik lacked finesse and caved when faced with it. Old man Hopkins schooled him and ruined his career. There's no way a 43 year old should be able to beat a 26 year old champion. Canelo would have worked Pavlik over.
                I see.

                So the oddsmakers were clueless when they made Pavlik a 4-1 favorite, yeah?

                Hey jackass, do you know what that fight is famous for?
                Bernard Hopkins staring down press row from inside the ring in the immediate aftermath of the fight because almost NOBODY thought he would win.

                Here's how one observer put it at the time:

                "It was one of the most remarkable sights in Boxing history."




                25 of Boxingscene's writers and analysts picked Pavlik - many of them picked Pavlik by KNOCKOUT.

                2 Picked Hopkins.

                You and the other boxing noobs in this thread making comments like this look like ****ing morons. Just so you know.

                Comment

                • SUBZER0ED
                  Be water, my friend.
                  Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
                  • Feb 2013
                  • 11341
                  • 2,531
                  • 1,953
                  • 34,667

                  #78
                  Originally posted by A-Wolf
                  I see.

                  So the oddsmakers were clueless when they made Pavlik a 4-1 favorite, yeah?

                  Hey jackass, do you know what that fight is famous for?
                  Bernard Hopkins staring down press row from inside the ring in the immediate aftermath of the fight because almost NOBODY thought he would win.

                  Here's how one observer put it at the time:

                  "It was one of the most remarkable sights in Boxing history."




                  25 of Boxingscene's writers and analysts picked Pavlik - many of them picked Pavlik by KNOCKOUT.

                  2 Picked Hopkins.

                  You and the other boxing noobs in this thread making comments like this look like ****ing morons. Just so you know.
                  You don't know how to debate a subject without resorting to childish name calling. Grow up. I said there's no way a 43 year old should beat a 26 year old champion, so obviously I agreed with the odds makers and just about everyone else. Hopkins was good, but Pavlik had weaknesses which he exploited. Canelo would have beaten Pavlik too, which is what this thread asks. What point are you trying to make?

                  Comment

                  • A-Wolf
                    This One Can See
                    Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
                    • Nov 2011
                    • 6759
                    • 265
                    • 337
                    • 61,371

                    #79
                    Originally posted by SUBZER0ED
                    You don't know how to debate a subject without resorting to childish name calling. Grow up. I said there's no way a 43 year old should beat a 26 year old champion, so obviously I agreed with the odds makers and just about everyone else. Hopkins was good, but Pavlik had weaknesses which he exploited. Canelo would have beaten Pavlik too, which is what this thread asks. What point are you trying to make?
                    lol I'm done with this. Whatever you want believe.

                    Comment

                    • Joe Beamish
                      Undisputed Champion
                      Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
                      • Aug 2014
                      • 3475
                      • 157
                      • 42
                      • 30,582

                      #80
                      Pavlik would force Canelo to engage. He was always active and busy. It would be a good fight.

                      While I admit Canelo has nice (cute) moves and a level head, I am unimpressed with his victories. Period. His decent opponents (e.g., Lara, Trout), he just managed to edge on the cards -- or in the case of Golovkin, sc**** out a draw against an old man, thanks mostly to having the usual judge on his side. His great opponent (Floyd) completely outclassed him. Canelo has no butt kicking wins against strong opponents in their real weight class, in their prime. Nothing approaching this.

                      Certainly Canelo never faced anybody remotely like Kelly Pavlik.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      TOP