Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Comments Thread For: Golovkin's Promoter: Saunders Will Be Next, Not a Canelo Trilogy

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #61
    Saunders??? in your dreams??? Canelo will woop your ******* easy

    Comment


    • #62
      Golovkin vs. Dominik Wade Trilogy coming up next.

      CANELO vs. Saunders for Undisputed!

      SAUL CANELO ALVAREZ Undisputed Middleweight Champion in just a couple of fights. Cotto + GGG + Saunders = Victims

      Comment


      • #63
        Originally posted by REYESdelBOXEO View Post
        Golovkin vs. Dominik Wade Trilogy coming up next.

        CANELO vs. Saunders for Undisputed!

        SAUL CANELO ALVAREZ Undisputed Middleweight Champion in just a couple of fights. Cotto + GGG + Saunders = Victims
        Keep dreaming :lol:

        Comment


        • #64
          Originally posted by redmyth79 View Post
          Lol. Really, you think Jacobs cheated. Lmao he didn't fight for the IBF title because the 170 next day weigh in. But he is a big 160lber and if memory serves me correctly any boxer and 98% due starve themselves to get in the lowest weight class they can. They changed the ruling for Canelo as all other belts don't do 2nd day weigh in. And the IBF was not about to give up the $ fees for the GGG and Canelo fight. Either way Canelo wins the rematch and probably pretty easy to be honest. GGG is aging and I don't see him fighting any better then his 1st fight but Canelo is in his prime and learns from each and every fight. Canelo also know what to expect from GGG and 3rd Canelo is going to be much better adjusted to the 160lb weight. A third fight will be GGG'S only option if Canelo gives it to him. Canelo will not give BJS the chance but Charlo will be a option as well as Danny Jacobs.
          It's going to be all up to Canelo who gets a crack at the belts. And for a sanctioning body to try to hold a mandatory good luck as Canelo doesn't care about the belts as much as the opponent.
          Lmao he didn't fight for the IBF title because the 170 next day weigh in.

          1st of Jacobs already paid the fee to the IBF. So what he basically did was fail the weight in their eyes. And WASTE his $$.


          They changed the ruling for Canelo as all other belts don't do 2nd day weigh in.

          2nd ??? You fkn know how old Canelo is??? And do you know how long this rule is in place??? WTF does Canelo time travel and some sht??? Damn this is the most RTARDED sht I read in a long time. And on this site full of DUMMIES??? You just set a NEW low.

          Comment


          • #65
            Originally posted by Shadoww702 View Post
            You do realize like over 70% of experts, media, and other boxers had GGG winning by only 1 round?? I watched the fight numerous times and can see 7-5 either way. And any more than that is straight Byrd'ing..

            How you score the fight??? .
            I had Golovkin winning but not by much either. I don't think the draw was the correct decision for a fight of this magnitude. I think it was clear that Golovkin won but I would've been ok even if the decision went to Canelo. I wouldn't like the decision but I would've accepted it.

            Comment


            • #66
              Originally posted by redmyth79 View Post
              Lmao, really. 1st rewatch the fight and see if GGG really landed 60 more punches because most hit Canelo's guard which means no. And Canelo landed at a much higher % on power shots by far with cleaner harder shots. GGG as you even pointed out threw 200 more shots but didn't land ****! Aggressor only counts if it's effective aggression!!! Which it clearly was not. When I watched it live I gave Canelo 1-3 and 10-12 draw. Rewatching it I had Canelo up 116/112 as I remembered effective aggression. And had it been a pure slick boxer like Mayweather nobody would have 2nd thought the score I gave Canelo as GGG was not effective. Canelo fought his fight and GGG looked bad. I'm a equal fan of both so no favorite picking just honest thought.
              Get off this thread Adelaide!

              Comment


              • #67
                Originally posted by harwri008 View Post
                I had Golovkin winning but not by much either. I don't think the draw was the correct decision for a fight of this magnitude. I think it was clear that Golovkin won but I would've been ok even if the decision went to Canelo. I wouldn't like the decision but I would've accepted it.
                Me to. As you know I scored it 7-5 for Canelo. Ive rewatched it and can see why ppl had 6-6 or 7-5 for Canelo. Outside of that someone REALLY liked their fighter...

                Comment


                • #68
                  Originally posted by Mirus View Post
                  Keep dreaming :lol:
                  It's gonna happen soon bro.
                  CANELO is the best Middleweight & fighter today.

                  Not a dream but maybe some peoples worse nightmare

                  Comment


                  • #69
                    Saunders next after he gets robbed of all his titles, great plan to give more leverage for the trilogy to be robbed once again by the crooked boxing Mafia.

                    Comment


                    • #70
                      Originally posted by Shadoww702 View Post
                      Me to. As you know I scored it 7-5 for Canelo. Ive rewatched it and can see why ppl had 6-6 or 7-5 for Canelo. Outside of that someone REALLY liked their fighter...
                      You probably also though Nelo beat Floyd, boxing can be subjective but ignoring punches landed and ring generalship really goes beyond fanboyism.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X
                      TOP